KDE

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Replies
      KDE
      Participant

        Thank you! 

        KDE
        Participant

          Thank you! 

          KDE
          Participant

            Thank you! 

            KDE
            Participant

              In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

              KDE
              Participant

                In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

                KDE
                Participant

                  In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

                  KDE
                  Participant

                    Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

                    KDE
                    Participant

                      Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

                      KDE
                      Participant

                        Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

                        KDE
                        Participant

                          Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

                          KDE
                          Participant

                            Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

                            KDE
                            Participant

                              Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

                          Viewing 1 reply thread