IMAlawMan

So basically, they are saying that the cells are abnormal, but not melnoma and that they recommend more removal because the entire thing wasn’t taken out?

So basically, they are saying that the cells are abnormal, but not melnoma and that they recommend more removal because the entire thing wasn’t taken out?

So basically, they are saying that the cells are abnormal, but not melnoma and that they recommend more removal because the entire thing wasn’t taken out?

Strangely, no final diagnosis is included. Thank you for your help. I feel much better.

Strangely, no final diagnosis is included. Thank you for your help. I feel much better.

Strangely, no final diagnosis is included. Thank you for your help. I feel much better.

Hi Janner-

Thanks for your help. I included everything from the pathology report. Doctor says that it is very abnormal, but not melanoma. Is it possible that after the second excision, results could come back as melanoma?

I know I must sound like a worried pansy, especially compared the the strong individuals on this forum faced with much worse than I, but I’d like a little piece of mind if I can get it.

Thanks Again

Hi Janner-

Thanks for your help. I included everything from the pathology report. Doctor says that it is very abnormal, but not melanoma. Is it possible that after the second excision, results could come back as melanoma?

I know I must sound like a worried pansy, especially compared the the strong individuals on this forum faced with much worse than I, but I’d like a little piece of mind if I can get it.

Thanks Again

Hi Janner-

Thanks for your help. I included everything from the pathology report. Doctor says that it is very abnormal, but not melanoma. Is it possible that after the second excision, results could come back as melanoma?

I know I must sound like a worried pansy, especially compared the the strong individuals on this forum faced with much worse than I, but I’d like a little piece of mind if I can get it.

Thanks Again