ECTechnology

Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).

Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).

Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).