Lymph Node Positive in Neck, Under Ear… No Primary?

Forums General Melanoma Community Lymph Node Positive in Neck, Under Ear… No Primary?

  • Post
    BVince
    Participant

      Yeah… Like I said above… No known primary. I'm scheduled for a PET scan on Monday.  Any idea as to the accuracy of a PET scan, and how helpful it can be in trying to identify the primary?  How quickly can this spread? I'm a vet, and have absolutely no confidence in a timely response by the VA. So I have gone through a non-VA provider and a separate medical insurance. Aside from this diagnosis, and the growth on my neck, I feel great!… I work out 2-3 hours a day.???

       

    Viewing 11 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          The primary site may never be found.  About 10% of melanoma stems from an unknown primary.   It is thought that there may have been a primary site but it "regressed" – that is, the body attacked the original site and destroyed it but not before cells had escaped and gone elsewhere.  PET scans only identify tumors about 5mm or larger so a PET probably wouldn't find most primary sites.  There is no way to predict spread – either location or speed or anything like that. 

          My elderly father had 4 cancers (including melanoma) and his care at the VA was as good as it would have been elsewhere.  Actually, for several treatments/tests, they sent him to the top cancer center in our area.  Not sure what the VA is like in your neck of the woods but our experience was very good.  I realize the VA has had a bad wrap recently but I had to talk them out of treatments/procedures because even though they were standard of care, they were not the best choice for my father.

          Janner
          Participant

            The primary site may never be found.  About 10% of melanoma stems from an unknown primary.   It is thought that there may have been a primary site but it "regressed" – that is, the body attacked the original site and destroyed it but not before cells had escaped and gone elsewhere.  PET scans only identify tumors about 5mm or larger so a PET probably wouldn't find most primary sites.  There is no way to predict spread – either location or speed or anything like that. 

            My elderly father had 4 cancers (including melanoma) and his care at the VA was as good as it would have been elsewhere.  Actually, for several treatments/tests, they sent him to the top cancer center in our area.  Not sure what the VA is like in your neck of the woods but our experience was very good.  I realize the VA has had a bad wrap recently but I had to talk them out of treatments/procedures because even though they were standard of care, they were not the best choice for my father.

            Janner
            Participant

              The primary site may never be found.  About 10% of melanoma stems from an unknown primary.   It is thought that there may have been a primary site but it "regressed" – that is, the body attacked the original site and destroyed it but not before cells had escaped and gone elsewhere.  PET scans only identify tumors about 5mm or larger so a PET probably wouldn't find most primary sites.  There is no way to predict spread – either location or speed or anything like that. 

              My elderly father had 4 cancers (including melanoma) and his care at the VA was as good as it would have been elsewhere.  Actually, for several treatments/tests, they sent him to the top cancer center in our area.  Not sure what the VA is like in your neck of the woods but our experience was very good.  I realize the VA has had a bad wrap recently but I had to talk them out of treatments/procedures because even though they were standard of care, they were not the best choice for my father.

              jennunicorn
              Participant

                You should get a CT scan to go along with the PET scan. A CT is done to look for tumors and can show the size of them. The PET is used as an indicator of "activity" which looks like a bright light. If there are large enough tumors the PET will have a certain amount of uptake (it soaks up the radioactive sugar that is injected into you before the scan), and based on that and comparing with what it looks like on CT, gives the radiologist a better idea of whether it's something possibly cancerous or not. A PET scan alone isn't as definitive as having both. At least that's what I understand from it all anyway. I get PET/CT combo scans where I get treated. I know that's not standard everywhere, some people only get CT scans and then they get PET scans only if they see something on CT they want to know more about. You should also be getting a brain MRI. These are all standard to get your base read internally in order for doctors to have something to compare and look back on with future scans.

                Many people, probably most of us, felt totally normal when we found out we had melanoma. It's a strange thing to feel good and healthy and have something like this going on inside your body. 

                Do you have a melanoma specialist?

                jennunicorn
                Participant

                  You should get a CT scan to go along with the PET scan. A CT is done to look for tumors and can show the size of them. The PET is used as an indicator of "activity" which looks like a bright light. If there are large enough tumors the PET will have a certain amount of uptake (it soaks up the radioactive sugar that is injected into you before the scan), and based on that and comparing with what it looks like on CT, gives the radiologist a better idea of whether it's something possibly cancerous or not. A PET scan alone isn't as definitive as having both. At least that's what I understand from it all anyway. I get PET/CT combo scans where I get treated. I know that's not standard everywhere, some people only get CT scans and then they get PET scans only if they see something on CT they want to know more about. You should also be getting a brain MRI. These are all standard to get your base read internally in order for doctors to have something to compare and look back on with future scans.

                  Many people, probably most of us, felt totally normal when we found out we had melanoma. It's a strange thing to feel good and healthy and have something like this going on inside your body. 

                  Do you have a melanoma specialist?

                  jennunicorn
                  Participant

                    You should get a CT scan to go along with the PET scan. A CT is done to look for tumors and can show the size of them. The PET is used as an indicator of "activity" which looks like a bright light. If there are large enough tumors the PET will have a certain amount of uptake (it soaks up the radioactive sugar that is injected into you before the scan), and based on that and comparing with what it looks like on CT, gives the radiologist a better idea of whether it's something possibly cancerous or not. A PET scan alone isn't as definitive as having both. At least that's what I understand from it all anyway. I get PET/CT combo scans where I get treated. I know that's not standard everywhere, some people only get CT scans and then they get PET scans only if they see something on CT they want to know more about. You should also be getting a brain MRI. These are all standard to get your base read internally in order for doctors to have something to compare and look back on with future scans.

                    Many people, probably most of us, felt totally normal when we found out we had melanoma. It's a strange thing to feel good and healthy and have something like this going on inside your body. 

                    Do you have a melanoma specialist?

                    snow white
                    Participant

                      My Dad has never had any doc find a "primary".  They list it as unknown.  He had 15 brain mets, over 20 in the spleen, one in the lung lower bowel and upper thigh.  Absolutely NO symptoms!!!  Scary stuff.  Please make sure you are seeing a Melanoma specialist!!!!

                      Best to you.

                      snow white
                      Participant

                        My Dad has never had any doc find a "primary".  They list it as unknown.  He had 15 brain mets, over 20 in the spleen, one in the lung lower bowel and upper thigh.  Absolutely NO symptoms!!!  Scary stuff.  Please make sure you are seeing a Melanoma specialist!!!!

                        Best to you.

                        snow white
                        Participant

                          My Dad has never had any doc find a "primary".  They list it as unknown.  He had 15 brain mets, over 20 in the spleen, one in the lung lower bowel and upper thigh.  Absolutely NO symptoms!!!  Scary stuff.  Please make sure you are seeing a Melanoma specialist!!!!

                          Best to you.

                          Linny
                          Participant

                            Welcome to the MUP (Melanoma with Unknown Primary) Club. ๐Ÿ™ While a PET scan is a good thing, it's not 100% accurate all the time. The suggestion to follow up with a CT scan was an excellent one. It should be a CT scan with contrast, which means you get to drink a "delicious" cocktail beforehand.

                            I'm glad to see to went outside the VA for this. MUP is not all that common and you should be under the care of a facility with a department dedicated to melanoma. If this is not the case with your current provider, please let us know, we can help you seek one out. If you are on Tricare, most places will accept this form of insurance. I'm on Tricare Standard right now and have had no issues with coverage anywhere. 

                            The primary will never be identified, therefore the sentinel node cannot be positively identified, either. The sentinel node is the first lymph to which the melanoma cells traveled. The most likely scenario is that your body's immune system identified the cancer and attempted to zap it. This actually was a good thing because your immune system recognized it. Unfortunately, before it could complete its job a few cells made their way to a lymph node and set up shop. The main course of treatment for someone with MUP is complete removal of all lymph nodes in the area in which the affected node was found. My affected node was in my left armpit and I had all the lymph nodes in that armpit removed. I'm coming up on 6 years with no evidence of disease. 

                            Here's a link to some good information on MUPs: 

                            https://www.utmb.edu/otoref/grnds/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11-28/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11.pdf

                            Linny
                            Participant

                              Welcome to the MUP (Melanoma with Unknown Primary) Club. ๐Ÿ™ While a PET scan is a good thing, it's not 100% accurate all the time. The suggestion to follow up with a CT scan was an excellent one. It should be a CT scan with contrast, which means you get to drink a "delicious" cocktail beforehand.

                              I'm glad to see to went outside the VA for this. MUP is not all that common and you should be under the care of a facility with a department dedicated to melanoma. If this is not the case with your current provider, please let us know, we can help you seek one out. If you are on Tricare, most places will accept this form of insurance. I'm on Tricare Standard right now and have had no issues with coverage anywhere. 

                              The primary will never be identified, therefore the sentinel node cannot be positively identified, either. The sentinel node is the first lymph to which the melanoma cells traveled. The most likely scenario is that your body's immune system identified the cancer and attempted to zap it. This actually was a good thing because your immune system recognized it. Unfortunately, before it could complete its job a few cells made their way to a lymph node and set up shop. The main course of treatment for someone with MUP is complete removal of all lymph nodes in the area in which the affected node was found. My affected node was in my left armpit and I had all the lymph nodes in that armpit removed. I'm coming up on 6 years with no evidence of disease. 

                              Here's a link to some good information on MUPs: 

                              https://www.utmb.edu/otoref/grnds/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11-28/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11.pdf

                              Linny
                              Participant

                                Welcome to the MUP (Melanoma with Unknown Primary) Club. ๐Ÿ™ While a PET scan is a good thing, it's not 100% accurate all the time. The suggestion to follow up with a CT scan was an excellent one. It should be a CT scan with contrast, which means you get to drink a "delicious" cocktail beforehand.

                                I'm glad to see to went outside the VA for this. MUP is not all that common and you should be under the care of a facility with a department dedicated to melanoma. If this is not the case with your current provider, please let us know, we can help you seek one out. If you are on Tricare, most places will accept this form of insurance. I'm on Tricare Standard right now and have had no issues with coverage anywhere. 

                                The primary will never be identified, therefore the sentinel node cannot be positively identified, either. The sentinel node is the first lymph to which the melanoma cells traveled. The most likely scenario is that your body's immune system identified the cancer and attempted to zap it. This actually was a good thing because your immune system recognized it. Unfortunately, before it could complete its job a few cells made their way to a lymph node and set up shop. The main course of treatment for someone with MUP is complete removal of all lymph nodes in the area in which the affected node was found. My affected node was in my left armpit and I had all the lymph nodes in that armpit removed. I'm coming up on 6 years with no evidence of disease. 

                                Here's a link to some good information on MUPs: 

                                https://www.utmb.edu/otoref/grnds/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11-28/melanoma-unk-primary-2012-11.pdf

                            Viewing 11 reply threads
                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                            About the MRF Patient Forum

                            The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                            The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide byย MRF posting policies.

                            Popular Topics