Is 2 days after radiation too soon for an MRI and PET/CT scans?

Forums General Melanoma Community Is 2 days after radiation too soon for an MRI and PET/CT scans?

  • Post
    arthurjedi007
    Participant

      I was wondering if 2 days after my last radiation treatment is too soon for an MRI and PET/CT scans?

      Basically my long distance doc on 8/13 did a PET/CT and wanted radiation done by 9/3 and wanted to do a brain MRI and another PET/CT on 9/24. But he wanted me to do radiation locally since I've had radiation there before. If the scans are ok then I can continue with the PD1. If the scan shows anything in the brain then I'm off the PD1.

      So in reality locally they did a brain MRI on 8/21 in preperation for the radiation. They also did a lower spine MRI on 8/21 and I got confirmation from my long distance doc we needed to radiate 2 spots in my spine. Basically there is 1 tumor in my skull that has grown out to my scalp and inward towards my brain pressing on the dura. Nothing is in my brain at that scan though. The 2 in my spine I'm not sure how much soft tissue involvement there is but they want to prevent the occurance last winter where another spot in the spine almost paralyzed me so hit them now instead of later.

      So finally I got my first zap to the spine today 9/9. Insurance was complaining because like the nurse said my local radiation doc wants to do it the more precise right way. They still haven't approved the head yet but they think they should be able to start it on 9/12. Basically I get 30 gray in 5 fractions to each spot of the spine and head. So basically each spot gets 6 gray per zap every other day. I say per zap but really it's several different zaps from various angles. I think I counted at least 6 zaps to the one spine spot today. So probably enough to get them to shrink I hope and hopefully the PD1 will then take care of them like it's shrinking over a dozen other tumors. They alternate which spot in the spine every other day. The head they will also do every other day but in combination with (or actually after) whatever spine spot for that day.

      So I'm wondering whether I should just stay home and recover from the radiation and get the newly FDA approved PD1 from my local onc doc on 9/24 who I still see for my xgeva shot. Last time I saw him he said I needed to stay on the PD1 so it should be no problem as long as I give them enough of a heads up so they can take care of the insurance. Then after the radiation and some rest and recovery I can go to my long distance doc for these re-scans.

      So not only am I concerned about not really being strong enough to travel the 500 miles to the long distance onc doc although I feel pretty good now. I'm wondering if scanning so soon after radiation should even be done. I remember reading one person's story who was on immunotherapy, did radiation and the doctor visibly saw the tumors shrank. So that person's doc did not want to scan yet because he saw an immune response and did not want to mess up that delicate little understood balance of the immune system if I remember that person's story right.

      I'm very thankful to Joe so I was able to question my radiation doc so he changed his initial idea and is doing my head the better way. You folks are the best.

      Any thoughts or suggestions are appreciated. I'm just not sure what to do.

      Artie

       

    Viewing 8 reply threads
    • Replies
        kylez
        Participant

          Artie,

          Going by the original schedule 9/24 = 9/3 + 21 days if I understand the dates right. If so do you think your distance doctor wanted the scans specifically on 9/24 no matter what, or could he want them whenever T+3 weeks came after your last radiation treatment? In which case maybe that would be pushed out some now?

          kylez
          Participant

            Artie,

            Going by the original schedule 9/24 = 9/3 + 21 days if I understand the dates right. If so do you think your distance doctor wanted the scans specifically on 9/24 no matter what, or could he want them whenever T+3 weeks came after your last radiation treatment? In which case maybe that would be pushed out some now?

            kylez
            Participant

              Artie,

              Going by the original schedule 9/24 = 9/3 + 21 days if I understand the dates right. If so do you think your distance doctor wanted the scans specifically on 9/24 no matter what, or could he want them whenever T+3 weeks came after your last radiation treatment? In which case maybe that would be pushed out some now?

              kylez
              Participant

                Never mind my first response — I get why you want to get on the scans as soon as possible so you can get back on the trial drug asap. The question I think of next is, does the trial / trial doctor require a 3-week wait after last radiation, whenever the radiation is completed, before they'll put you back on trial drug?

                I guess one question is, which will actually be the bigger delay? Will your local doctor be able to get you on the FDA approved pembro on the 24th? Or could that get delayed for the reasons things get delayed (insurance if nothing else?) Since it could get delayed, maybe hedge your bets and keep going for both until an IV is in your arm from one or the other?

                I hope the drug is back in your system soon. 

                kylez
                Participant

                  Never mind my first response — I get why you want to get on the scans as soon as possible so you can get back on the trial drug asap. The question I think of next is, does the trial / trial doctor require a 3-week wait after last radiation, whenever the radiation is completed, before they'll put you back on trial drug?

                  I guess one question is, which will actually be the bigger delay? Will your local doctor be able to get you on the FDA approved pembro on the 24th? Or could that get delayed for the reasons things get delayed (insurance if nothing else?) Since it could get delayed, maybe hedge your bets and keep going for both until an IV is in your arm from one or the other?

                  I hope the drug is back in your system soon. 

                  kylez
                  Participant

                    Never mind my first response — I get why you want to get on the scans as soon as possible so you can get back on the trial drug asap. The question I think of next is, does the trial / trial doctor require a 3-week wait after last radiation, whenever the radiation is completed, before they'll put you back on trial drug?

                    I guess one question is, which will actually be the bigger delay? Will your local doctor be able to get you on the FDA approved pembro on the 24th? Or could that get delayed for the reasons things get delayed (insurance if nothing else?) Since it could get delayed, maybe hedge your bets and keep going for both until an IV is in your arm from one or the other?

                    I hope the drug is back in your system soon. 

                      arthurjedi007
                      Participant

                        I think the long distance onc doc talked to his colleauges and wanted to only allow 6 weeks to get the radiation done and then scan. I did not miss any doses of pd1 yet though. He continued with them. Just that if the scans on the 24th show it's in my brain then no pd1.

                        Yeah my local onc doc would need enough time to get it through the insurance. That's the only delay I could think of. I would pay for a dose myself though cause it is worth every penny to me but I'm not sure if the hospital would allow that although they might cause they mentioned it last year when I started zel about maybe buying a week or so of pills myself but the insurance went through in the same day so I didn't have to.

                        Hedge my bets and keep both options open. Hmm. Hadn't thought of that. Thanks kyle.

                         

                        arthurjedi007
                        Participant

                          I think the long distance onc doc talked to his colleauges and wanted to only allow 6 weeks to get the radiation done and then scan. I did not miss any doses of pd1 yet though. He continued with them. Just that if the scans on the 24th show it's in my brain then no pd1.

                          Yeah my local onc doc would need enough time to get it through the insurance. That's the only delay I could think of. I would pay for a dose myself though cause it is worth every penny to me but I'm not sure if the hospital would allow that although they might cause they mentioned it last year when I started zel about maybe buying a week or so of pills myself but the insurance went through in the same day so I didn't have to.

                          Hedge my bets and keep both options open. Hmm. Hadn't thought of that. Thanks kyle.

                           

                          arthurjedi007
                          Participant

                            I think the long distance onc doc talked to his colleauges and wanted to only allow 6 weeks to get the radiation done and then scan. I did not miss any doses of pd1 yet though. He continued with them. Just that if the scans on the 24th show it's in my brain then no pd1.

                            Yeah my local onc doc would need enough time to get it through the insurance. That's the only delay I could think of. I would pay for a dose myself though cause it is worth every penny to me but I'm not sure if the hospital would allow that although they might cause they mentioned it last year when I started zel about maybe buying a week or so of pills myself but the insurance went through in the same day so I didn't have to.

                            Hedge my bets and keep both options open. Hmm. Hadn't thought of that. Thanks kyle.

                             

                          RJoeyB
                          Participant
                            Artie,
                             
                            While I don't think any of us would wish our melanoma experience on anyone, it's good to hear that your plan is moving forward — and I'm glad I could be helpful in some way; it's interesting, while doctors often collaborate directly, sometimes they end up consulting with each other indirectly through their patients…  anyway, the 30-Gy in 5 fractions is very familiar, and I, too, always found myself counting the "zaps" and angles during each treatment session.
                             
                            Has your doctor said why he wants to do scans so soon?  I've seen two different radiation oncologists, both at my cancer hospital, over the past four years, one who has handled my various bone mets and one who did the CyberKnife after my craniotomy and also treated my lung met.  For PET/CT, neither ever wanted to do a scan earlier than three months after finishing treatment.  Their reasoning is that anything earlier would still likely show activity at the treated sites, perhaps even greater activity because of the inflammatory response in the treated tumors and surrounding tissues.  Now, with my lung met, my next "regularly scheduled" 3-month full-body PET/CT fell at the two month mark after finishing treatment.  She was O.K. with me having it done, but set expectations to not be too alarmed if that met didn't show improvement or even showed increased size or activity.  I personally wanted it done then, too, because I wanted to stay on top of anything else going on elsewhere in the body.  I also had a similar situation following surgery to a met in my tibia.  My medical oncologist wanted to wait an extra month for my regular scan, but this time I used the same logic with him that my radiation oncologist used with me.  I wanted to stay "on schedule" with my quarterly scan and told him that I was comfortable knowing that the surgical site would light like a Christmas tree, but I still want to have that regular monitoring of the rest or my body.  Brain MRI was a little different, but even then, we waited two months for my first scan following treatment (we stayed at every two months for the first six months and then moved tom every three months ever since).  With the lung met, it actually did show improvement on the two-month scan, which we were surprised at, but obviously pleased.  With the tibial met, it did light up more brightly than any met I've ever had, but we went in assuming it would and were fine with it.
                             
                            The big question I have is why he wants to do scans so soon?  If it's to monitor response to what's currently being treated, that doesn't make sense to me, at least based on everything all of my doctors have ever told me.  If it's to monitor elsewhere in the body and brain, since you had both scans in mid-August, then I would assume the earliest your next scans would be is mid-October.  At that point, it is likely still too early to see any response for the mets being treated now, but I don't know if your PD-1 trial requires scans every three months, so you might not be able to wait longer for the scans.  
                             
                            I know I wrote a lot there, let me know if I wasn't as clear as needed and I'm happy to try to clarify.
                             
                            I hope your remaining radiation sessions all go smoothly.  Always wishing you the best,
                            Joe
                             
                            RJoeyB
                            Participant
                              Artie,
                               
                              While I don't think any of us would wish our melanoma experience on anyone, it's good to hear that your plan is moving forward — and I'm glad I could be helpful in some way; it's interesting, while doctors often collaborate directly, sometimes they end up consulting with each other indirectly through their patients…  anyway, the 30-Gy in 5 fractions is very familiar, and I, too, always found myself counting the "zaps" and angles during each treatment session.
                               
                              Has your doctor said why he wants to do scans so soon?  I've seen two different radiation oncologists, both at my cancer hospital, over the past four years, one who has handled my various bone mets and one who did the CyberKnife after my craniotomy and also treated my lung met.  For PET/CT, neither ever wanted to do a scan earlier than three months after finishing treatment.  Their reasoning is that anything earlier would still likely show activity at the treated sites, perhaps even greater activity because of the inflammatory response in the treated tumors and surrounding tissues.  Now, with my lung met, my next "regularly scheduled" 3-month full-body PET/CT fell at the two month mark after finishing treatment.  She was O.K. with me having it done, but set expectations to not be too alarmed if that met didn't show improvement or even showed increased size or activity.  I personally wanted it done then, too, because I wanted to stay on top of anything else going on elsewhere in the body.  I also had a similar situation following surgery to a met in my tibia.  My medical oncologist wanted to wait an extra month for my regular scan, but this time I used the same logic with him that my radiation oncologist used with me.  I wanted to stay "on schedule" with my quarterly scan and told him that I was comfortable knowing that the surgical site would light like a Christmas tree, but I still want to have that regular monitoring of the rest or my body.  Brain MRI was a little different, but even then, we waited two months for my first scan following treatment (we stayed at every two months for the first six months and then moved tom every three months ever since).  With the lung met, it actually did show improvement on the two-month scan, which we were surprised at, but obviously pleased.  With the tibial met, it did light up more brightly than any met I've ever had, but we went in assuming it would and were fine with it.
                               
                              The big question I have is why he wants to do scans so soon?  If it's to monitor response to what's currently being treated, that doesn't make sense to me, at least based on everything all of my doctors have ever told me.  If it's to monitor elsewhere in the body and brain, since you had both scans in mid-August, then I would assume the earliest your next scans would be is mid-October.  At that point, it is likely still too early to see any response for the mets being treated now, but I don't know if your PD-1 trial requires scans every three months, so you might not be able to wait longer for the scans.  
                               
                              I know I wrote a lot there, let me know if I wasn't as clear as needed and I'm happy to try to clarify.
                               
                              I hope your remaining radiation sessions all go smoothly.  Always wishing you the best,
                              Joe
                               
                              RJoeyB
                              Participant
                                Artie,
                                 
                                While I don't think any of us would wish our melanoma experience on anyone, it's good to hear that your plan is moving forward — and I'm glad I could be helpful in some way; it's interesting, while doctors often collaborate directly, sometimes they end up consulting with each other indirectly through their patients…  anyway, the 30-Gy in 5 fractions is very familiar, and I, too, always found myself counting the "zaps" and angles during each treatment session.
                                 
                                Has your doctor said why he wants to do scans so soon?  I've seen two different radiation oncologists, both at my cancer hospital, over the past four years, one who has handled my various bone mets and one who did the CyberKnife after my craniotomy and also treated my lung met.  For PET/CT, neither ever wanted to do a scan earlier than three months after finishing treatment.  Their reasoning is that anything earlier would still likely show activity at the treated sites, perhaps even greater activity because of the inflammatory response in the treated tumors and surrounding tissues.  Now, with my lung met, my next "regularly scheduled" 3-month full-body PET/CT fell at the two month mark after finishing treatment.  She was O.K. with me having it done, but set expectations to not be too alarmed if that met didn't show improvement or even showed increased size or activity.  I personally wanted it done then, too, because I wanted to stay on top of anything else going on elsewhere in the body.  I also had a similar situation following surgery to a met in my tibia.  My medical oncologist wanted to wait an extra month for my regular scan, but this time I used the same logic with him that my radiation oncologist used with me.  I wanted to stay "on schedule" with my quarterly scan and told him that I was comfortable knowing that the surgical site would light like a Christmas tree, but I still want to have that regular monitoring of the rest or my body.  Brain MRI was a little different, but even then, we waited two months for my first scan following treatment (we stayed at every two months for the first six months and then moved tom every three months ever since).  With the lung met, it actually did show improvement on the two-month scan, which we were surprised at, but obviously pleased.  With the tibial met, it did light up more brightly than any met I've ever had, but we went in assuming it would and were fine with it.
                                 
                                The big question I have is why he wants to do scans so soon?  If it's to monitor response to what's currently being treated, that doesn't make sense to me, at least based on everything all of my doctors have ever told me.  If it's to monitor elsewhere in the body and brain, since you had both scans in mid-August, then I would assume the earliest your next scans would be is mid-October.  At that point, it is likely still too early to see any response for the mets being treated now, but I don't know if your PD-1 trial requires scans every three months, so you might not be able to wait longer for the scans.  
                                 
                                I know I wrote a lot there, let me know if I wasn't as clear as needed and I'm happy to try to clarify.
                                 
                                I hope your remaining radiation sessions all go smoothly.  Always wishing you the best,
                                Joe
                                 
                                  arthurjedi007
                                  Participant

                                    Thanks Joe. The PD1 trial is Merck's Extended Access Program which leaves all scans up to the doctor. Now it has been FDA approved I should be able to transition out of that trial I would think.

                                    I'm also baffled why the long distance onc doc wants to scan so soon. It makes no sense to me. Basically all he told me is if the scans show anything in the brain he cannot continue with the PD1. His doctor's notes on 9/3 which was my latest PD1 dose say:

                                    "He had an interval PET scan that was done earlier in August, and the concern was for a mixed response, which needed reevaluation which would be done after two subsequent cycles which would be after today's visit before the next cycle when he comes in. This would include a PET scan of his body including an MRI of his brain/skull given the increase in the size of the scalp metastases. Of note, we looked into the possibilities of different treatment options within the trial, and he could get palliative radiation to the skull lesion. He already had been seeing radiation oncology back at home so I recommended that he be seen by radiation oncology at home, for which he
                                    is going to start radiation coming Monday. Additionally, the radiation oncologist back at home would also like to give radiation to one of the lesions in his spine which is very reasonable and is allowed per the protocol. We will look forward to the scans next visit to determine further treatment on the trial."

                                    The notes also say:

                                    "is in today for ongoing immunotherapy for the melanoma in the form of the anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Overall, he is tolerating the therapy well and after four cycles of therapy, he had a mixed response and after extensive discussion with our melanoma colleagues, the plan was to do two more cycles with a close interval followup with another PET-CT scan; also in the meanwhile, get the parietal lesion on his scalp radiated given the close proximity to the brain parenchyma and also as allowed by the trial, he will also get palliative radiation to one of the spine lesions. We will have to decide on the next visit as to how
                                    the scans look to determine further eligibility on the trial. If he were to come off the trial resuming the combination dabrafenib/trametinib would be one option. The other option would be to consider any other clinical trial as long as there are no brain metastases. Currently, there are no symptoms or anything suggesting as such, and we will have to see the follow-up interval imaging to see what the patient would be eligible for."

                                    I also don't know what he meant by palliative. I don't give a care about the pain. I want the radiation to shrink the tumors and the pd1 to take over shrinking them which is what the radiation doc says his plan is. So that part of his report did not make sense to me either. Also it's really 2 spine spots instead of 1.

                                    When I questioned him on the dafrabenib/trametinib combo idea he said well almost everything was shrinking when I was on it. That is not true so I had to refresh his memory. Almost everything stayed the same. The one in my shoulder grew by a huge amount. A brand new one in my collar showed up and grew a lot. Only 3 in my spine may have shrank by a small amount. So in my opinion PD1 has been way better for me than the combo pills. With it over a dozen are shrinking, 4 stayed the same, 5 grew. But of those 5 the left shoulder shows it is being destroyed from the inside out. 3 we are radiating. So that just leaves the left collar which visibily has stayed the same.

                                    So I really can't understand why he wants to scan so soon. I hate scans anyway. They always seem to take a lot out of me probably because they do them too often. My local onc doc finally changed to pretty much do a every 3 month pet/ct which didn't bother me as much.

                                    So if he does these scans so soon it sounds like he won't really be able to tell anything from the 3 radiated spots. He will see if the brain is still clear which it was on the 8/21 scan so why do it again just barely over a month later makes no sense to me.

                                    I guess my biggest concern is I will already be weakened by the radiation, then the long trip up there, then weakened by the scans. then after all that he decides to quit the PD1 and puts me back on the combo pills. Then everything gets worse for me instead of better.

                                    On the other hand I can call my local onc doc and get setup to get the PD1 here on 9/24 and from then on and maybe go to the long distance onc doc later if he will still see me that is. If it wasn't for the long distance onc doc I wouldn't even be getting the radiation which is a great thing. In my opinion it should have been done last spring when I was on the pills but that was with my local onc doc who never mentioned this head issue although his feb mri showed it pressing on the dura then too. I'm just really lucky it hasn't gone further.

                                    With all that I'm still unclear why he wants to scan so soon and I'm not sure what to do.

                                    Artie

                                     

                                    kylez
                                    Participant

                                      I'll infer there's no easy way of communicating with the distance doc to ask that question? 

                                      One thing I like about the sites with MyChart is it's easy to drop an email to the doctor, and they or someone will always pick it up.

                                      arthurjedi007
                                      Participant

                                        Not sure I understood his answer but he was fine setting up the PD1 local. So that is already setup too except a day early on 9/23. He does want to make sure I get scans soon to make sure the tumors are not growing. He does not want to keep me on PD1 if tumors are growing was what he said. So when I talk to my radiation doc monday I'll ask him when would be the best time. Probably 2 months I guess would be a good answer. 6 weeks at the earliest from past radiation experience although they always decided not to rescan those 2 times.

                                        So all is good. Radiation going on. I get a couple more doses of PD1 and voila scans are hopefully going to show for the first time ever that everything is shrinking. That's the plan anyway and God willing it will happen.

                                        Thanks.

                                        Artie

                                         

                                        arthurjedi007
                                        Participant

                                          Not sure I understood his answer but he was fine setting up the PD1 local. So that is already setup too except a day early on 9/23. He does want to make sure I get scans soon to make sure the tumors are not growing. He does not want to keep me on PD1 if tumors are growing was what he said. So when I talk to my radiation doc monday I'll ask him when would be the best time. Probably 2 months I guess would be a good answer. 6 weeks at the earliest from past radiation experience although they always decided not to rescan those 2 times.

                                          So all is good. Radiation going on. I get a couple more doses of PD1 and voila scans are hopefully going to show for the first time ever that everything is shrinking. That's the plan anyway and God willing it will happen.

                                          Thanks.

                                          Artie

                                           

                                          arthurjedi007
                                          Participant

                                            Not sure I understood his answer but he was fine setting up the PD1 local. So that is already setup too except a day early on 9/23. He does want to make sure I get scans soon to make sure the tumors are not growing. He does not want to keep me on PD1 if tumors are growing was what he said. So when I talk to my radiation doc monday I'll ask him when would be the best time. Probably 2 months I guess would be a good answer. 6 weeks at the earliest from past radiation experience although they always decided not to rescan those 2 times.

                                            So all is good. Radiation going on. I get a couple more doses of PD1 and voila scans are hopefully going to show for the first time ever that everything is shrinking. That's the plan anyway and God willing it will happen.

                                            Thanks.

                                            Artie

                                             

                                            kylez
                                            Participant

                                              I'll infer there's no easy way of communicating with the distance doc to ask that question? 

                                              One thing I like about the sites with MyChart is it's easy to drop an email to the doctor, and they or someone will always pick it up.

                                              kylez
                                              Participant

                                                I'll infer there's no easy way of communicating with the distance doc to ask that question? 

                                                One thing I like about the sites with MyChart is it's easy to drop an email to the doctor, and they or someone will always pick it up.

                                                arthurjedi007
                                                Participant

                                                  Thanks Joe. The PD1 trial is Merck's Extended Access Program which leaves all scans up to the doctor. Now it has been FDA approved I should be able to transition out of that trial I would think.

                                                  I'm also baffled why the long distance onc doc wants to scan so soon. It makes no sense to me. Basically all he told me is if the scans show anything in the brain he cannot continue with the PD1. His doctor's notes on 9/3 which was my latest PD1 dose say:

                                                  "He had an interval PET scan that was done earlier in August, and the concern was for a mixed response, which needed reevaluation which would be done after two subsequent cycles which would be after today's visit before the next cycle when he comes in. This would include a PET scan of his body including an MRI of his brain/skull given the increase in the size of the scalp metastases. Of note, we looked into the possibilities of different treatment options within the trial, and he could get palliative radiation to the skull lesion. He already had been seeing radiation oncology back at home so I recommended that he be seen by radiation oncology at home, for which he
                                                  is going to start radiation coming Monday. Additionally, the radiation oncologist back at home would also like to give radiation to one of the lesions in his spine which is very reasonable and is allowed per the protocol. We will look forward to the scans next visit to determine further treatment on the trial."

                                                  The notes also say:

                                                  "is in today for ongoing immunotherapy for the melanoma in the form of the anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Overall, he is tolerating the therapy well and after four cycles of therapy, he had a mixed response and after extensive discussion with our melanoma colleagues, the plan was to do two more cycles with a close interval followup with another PET-CT scan; also in the meanwhile, get the parietal lesion on his scalp radiated given the close proximity to the brain parenchyma and also as allowed by the trial, he will also get palliative radiation to one of the spine lesions. We will have to decide on the next visit as to how
                                                  the scans look to determine further eligibility on the trial. If he were to come off the trial resuming the combination dabrafenib/trametinib would be one option. The other option would be to consider any other clinical trial as long as there are no brain metastases. Currently, there are no symptoms or anything suggesting as such, and we will have to see the follow-up interval imaging to see what the patient would be eligible for."

                                                  I also don't know what he meant by palliative. I don't give a care about the pain. I want the radiation to shrink the tumors and the pd1 to take over shrinking them which is what the radiation doc says his plan is. So that part of his report did not make sense to me either. Also it's really 2 spine spots instead of 1.

                                                  When I questioned him on the dafrabenib/trametinib combo idea he said well almost everything was shrinking when I was on it. That is not true so I had to refresh his memory. Almost everything stayed the same. The one in my shoulder grew by a huge amount. A brand new one in my collar showed up and grew a lot. Only 3 in my spine may have shrank by a small amount. So in my opinion PD1 has been way better for me than the combo pills. With it over a dozen are shrinking, 4 stayed the same, 5 grew. But of those 5 the left shoulder shows it is being destroyed from the inside out. 3 we are radiating. So that just leaves the left collar which visibily has stayed the same.

                                                  So I really can't understand why he wants to scan so soon. I hate scans anyway. They always seem to take a lot out of me probably because they do them too often. My local onc doc finally changed to pretty much do a every 3 month pet/ct which didn't bother me as much.

                                                  So if he does these scans so soon it sounds like he won't really be able to tell anything from the 3 radiated spots. He will see if the brain is still clear which it was on the 8/21 scan so why do it again just barely over a month later makes no sense to me.

                                                  I guess my biggest concern is I will already be weakened by the radiation, then the long trip up there, then weakened by the scans. then after all that he decides to quit the PD1 and puts me back on the combo pills. Then everything gets worse for me instead of better.

                                                  On the other hand I can call my local onc doc and get setup to get the PD1 here on 9/24 and from then on and maybe go to the long distance onc doc later if he will still see me that is. If it wasn't for the long distance onc doc I wouldn't even be getting the radiation which is a great thing. In my opinion it should have been done last spring when I was on the pills but that was with my local onc doc who never mentioned this head issue although his feb mri showed it pressing on the dura then too. I'm just really lucky it hasn't gone further.

                                                  With all that I'm still unclear why he wants to scan so soon and I'm not sure what to do.

                                                  Artie

                                                   

                                                  arthurjedi007
                                                  Participant

                                                    Thanks Joe. The PD1 trial is Merck's Extended Access Program which leaves all scans up to the doctor. Now it has been FDA approved I should be able to transition out of that trial I would think.

                                                    I'm also baffled why the long distance onc doc wants to scan so soon. It makes no sense to me. Basically all he told me is if the scans show anything in the brain he cannot continue with the PD1. His doctor's notes on 9/3 which was my latest PD1 dose say:

                                                    "He had an interval PET scan that was done earlier in August, and the concern was for a mixed response, which needed reevaluation which would be done after two subsequent cycles which would be after today's visit before the next cycle when he comes in. This would include a PET scan of his body including an MRI of his brain/skull given the increase in the size of the scalp metastases. Of note, we looked into the possibilities of different treatment options within the trial, and he could get palliative radiation to the skull lesion. He already had been seeing radiation oncology back at home so I recommended that he be seen by radiation oncology at home, for which he
                                                    is going to start radiation coming Monday. Additionally, the radiation oncologist back at home would also like to give radiation to one of the lesions in his spine which is very reasonable and is allowed per the protocol. We will look forward to the scans next visit to determine further treatment on the trial."

                                                    The notes also say:

                                                    "is in today for ongoing immunotherapy for the melanoma in the form of the anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Overall, he is tolerating the therapy well and after four cycles of therapy, he had a mixed response and after extensive discussion with our melanoma colleagues, the plan was to do two more cycles with a close interval followup with another PET-CT scan; also in the meanwhile, get the parietal lesion on his scalp radiated given the close proximity to the brain parenchyma and also as allowed by the trial, he will also get palliative radiation to one of the spine lesions. We will have to decide on the next visit as to how
                                                    the scans look to determine further eligibility on the trial. If he were to come off the trial resuming the combination dabrafenib/trametinib would be one option. The other option would be to consider any other clinical trial as long as there are no brain metastases. Currently, there are no symptoms or anything suggesting as such, and we will have to see the follow-up interval imaging to see what the patient would be eligible for."

                                                    I also don't know what he meant by palliative. I don't give a care about the pain. I want the radiation to shrink the tumors and the pd1 to take over shrinking them which is what the radiation doc says his plan is. So that part of his report did not make sense to me either. Also it's really 2 spine spots instead of 1.

                                                    When I questioned him on the dafrabenib/trametinib combo idea he said well almost everything was shrinking when I was on it. That is not true so I had to refresh his memory. Almost everything stayed the same. The one in my shoulder grew by a huge amount. A brand new one in my collar showed up and grew a lot. Only 3 in my spine may have shrank by a small amount. So in my opinion PD1 has been way better for me than the combo pills. With it over a dozen are shrinking, 4 stayed the same, 5 grew. But of those 5 the left shoulder shows it is being destroyed from the inside out. 3 we are radiating. So that just leaves the left collar which visibily has stayed the same.

                                                    So I really can't understand why he wants to scan so soon. I hate scans anyway. They always seem to take a lot out of me probably because they do them too often. My local onc doc finally changed to pretty much do a every 3 month pet/ct which didn't bother me as much.

                                                    So if he does these scans so soon it sounds like he won't really be able to tell anything from the 3 radiated spots. He will see if the brain is still clear which it was on the 8/21 scan so why do it again just barely over a month later makes no sense to me.

                                                    I guess my biggest concern is I will already be weakened by the radiation, then the long trip up there, then weakened by the scans. then after all that he decides to quit the PD1 and puts me back on the combo pills. Then everything gets worse for me instead of better.

                                                    On the other hand I can call my local onc doc and get setup to get the PD1 here on 9/24 and from then on and maybe go to the long distance onc doc later if he will still see me that is. If it wasn't for the long distance onc doc I wouldn't even be getting the radiation which is a great thing. In my opinion it should have been done last spring when I was on the pills but that was with my local onc doc who never mentioned this head issue although his feb mri showed it pressing on the dura then too. I'm just really lucky it hasn't gone further.

                                                    With all that I'm still unclear why he wants to scan so soon and I'm not sure what to do.

                                                    Artie

                                                     

                                              Viewing 8 reply threads
                                              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                              About the MRF Patient Forum

                                              The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                              The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                                              Popular Topics