My brother (Stage IV with brain mets) has had many CT scans and MRIs but never a PET scan. Nobody at the VA or at Moffitt ever suggested one. Is there any particular reason to use PET vs CT vs MRI?
My brother (Stage IV with brain mets) has had many CT scans and MRIs but never a PET scan. Nobody at the VA or at Moffitt ever suggested one. Is there any particular reason to use PET vs CT vs MRI?
PET scans are usually done if you are trying to find if/where melanoma is the body. I had for the first 6 years of my stage 4 and when they found something they suspected they would do a CT. Once my cancer became active they have switched me to Mri's and Ct's.
In my case the PEt picked up the melanoma in my arms – twice. A CT does not scan the arm.
PET scans are usually done if you are trying to find if/where melanoma is the body. I had for the first 6 years of my stage 4 and when they found something they suspected they would do a CT. Once my cancer became active they have switched me to Mri's and Ct's.
In my case the PEt picked up the melanoma in my arms – twice. A CT does not scan the arm.
PET scans are usually done if you are trying to find if/where melanoma is the body. I had for the first 6 years of my stage 4 and when they found something they suspected they would do a CT. Once my cancer became active they have switched me to Mri's and Ct's.
In my case the PEt picked up the melanoma in my arms – twice. A CT does not scan the arm.
I don’t know about lungs but I’ve had many cardiac MRIs. PET returns many false positives which leads to more worry and more tests. That’s why many docs don’t like them. There are very good with detecting bone mets however and I have a history so I get them every 6 mos.
I don’t know about lungs but I’ve had many cardiac MRIs. PET returns many false positives which leads to more worry and more tests. That’s why many docs don’t like them. There are very good with detecting bone mets however and I have a history so I get them every 6 mos.
I don’t know about lungs but I’ve had many cardiac MRIs. PET returns many false positives which leads to more worry and more tests. That’s why many docs don’t like them. There are very good with detecting bone mets however and I have a history so I get them every 6 mos.
The reason for the use of CT scans over Pet scans is that the CT scan results can be measured. By measuring the size of the tumor they can determine if the tumor is growing or shrinking. Radiation is also an issue, that is why they use a MRI for the brain.
The reason for the use of CT scans over Pet scans is that the CT scan results can be measured. By measuring the size of the tumor they can determine if the tumor is growing or shrinking. Radiation is also an issue, that is why they use a MRI for the brain.
The reason for the use of CT scans over Pet scans is that the CT scan results can be measured. By measuring the size of the tumor they can determine if the tumor is growing or shrinking. Radiation is also an issue, that is why they use a MRI for the brain.
Viewing 8 reply threads
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum
The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.
The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.
.
.
