That's a very broad question. Depends what your initial diagnosis and biopsy shows. In my case, after biopsy which was indertimate, he explained that they would do a wide excision and sentinel node biopsy. He also explained what his thoughts were on the likeliness of more advanced disease, etc. I came with several questions of my own.
After my SLNB came back with two positive nodes, my surgical,oncologist recommended interferon and a complete lymph,node dissection. From what I read of interferon, I wasn't comfortable with that option. I then went to another surgical oncologist to re-evaluate my pathology report. He agreed that there were enough suspicious elements in my path to treat this like melanoma and also told me I could opt for the CLND or just observation. I opted for,the CLND. In both cases the surgeons were very generous with their time and explained thoroughly my options and the benefits of each.
hope that helps. You might get better info though, if you provide,more,detail.
That's a very broad question. Depends what your initial diagnosis and biopsy shows. In my case, after biopsy which was indertimate, he explained that they would do a wide excision and sentinel node biopsy. He also explained what his thoughts were on the likeliness of more advanced disease, etc. I came with several questions of my own.
After my SLNB came back with two positive nodes, my surgical,oncologist recommended interferon and a complete lymph,node dissection. From what I read of interferon, I wasn't comfortable with that option. I then went to another surgical oncologist to re-evaluate my pathology report. He agreed that there were enough suspicious elements in my path to treat this like melanoma and also told me I could opt for the CLND or just observation. I opted for,the CLND. In both cases the surgeons were very generous with their time and explained thoroughly my options and the benefits of each.
hope that helps. You might get better info though, if you provide,more,detail.
Thanks for this info. I guess I just meant will he do an exam – check lymph nodes "by hand" and look at the melanoma sites themselves, etc. Or is this just an explanation of the procedures? The doctor who took the punch biopsies (I have two primary sites) told me they want to do excisions and sentinel node biopsies. This is my first meeting with the surgeon since the initial biopsies and just wondered what happens.
I have an idea of what to expect for the day of the surgery and will ask questions about what I still want to know; just wondered about whether he would do an exam in the first visit – which is not the surgery date.
Thanks for this info. I guess I just meant will he do an exam – check lymph nodes "by hand" and look at the melanoma sites themselves, etc. Or is this just an explanation of the procedures? The doctor who took the punch biopsies (I have two primary sites) told me they want to do excisions and sentinel node biopsies. This is my first meeting with the surgeon since the initial biopsies and just wondered what happens.
I have an idea of what to expect for the day of the surgery and will ask questions about what I still want to know; just wondered about whether he would do an exam in the first visit – which is not the surgery date.
He probably will do a exam. I have found that the doctors I’ve seen so far do a pretty generic exam. Listen to your chest feel around major lymph basins…groin, armpit, collerbone area check ankles for swelling and look at surgical sites. Maybe that’s considered thorough i guess. Seems they rely on ct pet and mri much more
He probably will do a exam. I have found that the doctors I’ve seen so far do a pretty generic exam. Listen to your chest feel around major lymph basins…groin, armpit, collerbone area check ankles for swelling and look at surgical sites. Maybe that’s considered thorough i guess. Seems they rely on ct pet and mri much more
He probably will do a exam. I have found that the doctors I’ve seen so far do a pretty generic exam. Listen to your chest feel around major lymph basins…groin, armpit, collerbone area check ankles for swelling and look at surgical sites. Maybe that’s considered thorough i guess. Seems they rely on ct pet and mri much more
What jamieth29 says is what my experience was. My original tumor was removed in my family doctor's office, because he was convinced it was nothing. When I saw the surgical oncologist, she examined my armpits, groin, and also felt my neck, as well as looking at the excision my family doctor did. She ordered a PET scan, and explained to me what would happen in the surgery.
What jamieth29 says is what my experience was. My original tumor was removed in my family doctor's office, because he was convinced it was nothing. When I saw the surgical oncologist, she examined my armpits, groin, and also felt my neck, as well as looking at the excision my family doctor did. She ordered a PET scan, and explained to me what would happen in the surgery.
What jamieth29 says is what my experience was. My original tumor was removed in my family doctor's office, because he was convinced it was nothing. When I saw the surgical oncologist, she examined my armpits, groin, and also felt my neck, as well as looking at the excision my family doctor did. She ordered a PET scan, and explained to me what would happen in the surgery.
Thanks for this info. I guess I just meant will he do an exam – check lymph nodes "by hand" and look at the melanoma sites themselves, etc. Or is this just an explanation of the procedures? The doctor who took the punch biopsies (I have two primary sites) told me they want to do excisions and sentinel node biopsies. This is my first meeting with the surgeon since the initial biopsies and just wondered what happens.
I have an idea of what to expect for the day of the surgery and will ask questions about what I still want to know; just wondered about whether he would do an exam in the first visit – which is not the surgery date.
That's a very broad question. Depends what your initial diagnosis and biopsy shows. In my case, after biopsy which was indertimate, he explained that they would do a wide excision and sentinel node biopsy. He also explained what his thoughts were on the likeliness of more advanced disease, etc. I came with several questions of my own.
After my SLNB came back with two positive nodes, my surgical,oncologist recommended interferon and a complete lymph,node dissection. From what I read of interferon, I wasn't comfortable with that option. I then went to another surgical oncologist to re-evaluate my pathology report. He agreed that there were enough suspicious elements in my path to treat this like melanoma and also told me I could opt for the CLND or just observation. I opted for,the CLND. In both cases the surgeons were very generous with their time and explained thoroughly my options and the benefits of each.
hope that helps. You might get better info though, if you provide,more,detail.
Viewing 2 reply threads
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum
The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.
The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.
.
.
