Dabrafenib compassionate use?

Forums General Melanoma Community Dabrafenib compassionate use?

  • Post
    POW
    Participant

      We just found out that my brother (stage IV with brain mets) did not respond to Zelboraf. He's back in the hospital with new brain tumors and edema. Because he received WBR, he does not qualify for any clinical trials. Does anybody know where we can find information about getting Dabrafenib on a compassionate use basis? Our oncologist is willing to look into it, but he doesn't know who to contact.

      We just found out that my brother (stage IV with brain mets) did not respond to Zelboraf. He's back in the hospital with new brain tumors and edema. Because he received WBR, he does not qualify for any clinical trials. Does anybody know where we can find information about getting Dabrafenib on a compassionate use basis? Our oncologist is willing to look into it, but he doesn't know who to contact.

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        lhaley
        Participant

          What I understand is that Zelboraf and Dabrafebin are basically the same.

            POW
            Participant

              They are chemically very similar but not identical. Dabrafenib is known to cross the blood-brain barrier and shink brain tumors. Nobody knows if Zelboraf gets into the brain or not and brain tumors are my brother's biggest problem. There are ongoing clinical trials to test Zelboraf on brain tumors, but my brother has been excluded from them. Hence me looking into possible compassionate use for Dabrafenib.

              lhaley
              Participant

                I was just recently in a Zelboraf trial that is across the country for brain mets.  I got out of the trial because they were making them redo the biopsy(b-raf) because mine was 2 years old and it was going to take a few more years.   When they originally did the statistics they discovered that zelboraf did pass through the brain barrier.  They are now re-doing the the brain part of the trial to have the scientic info to back the info.   I was put on the trial for several brain mets. 

                I have asked my mel oncologist several times for the difference between zelboraf and and dabrafenib and he has just explained it as one being the generic of the opposite.  I might be misunderstanding some of this.  I found this artlicle that James from Sydney had posted several months ago.  I could not link it correctly but have cut and pasted.

                 

                 

                A phase-II clinical trial with the longest follow-up to date confirmed that vemurafenib induces a clinical response in more than half of patients with advanced melanoma expressing BRAFV600 mutations, according to a report in the Feb. 23 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

                Median overall survival was 16 months in these patients, who had highly unfavorable characteristics at baseline. With follow-up as long as 20 months, this study “provides critical information on long-term survival” that was not available from previous studies of vemurafenib (Zelboraf) in metastatic melanoma, said Dr. Jeffrey A. Sosman of the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and his associates.

                The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved vemurafenib on Aug. 17, 2011 for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. The FDA acted after a pivotal phase-III trial showed vemurafenib improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine. When the phase-III data were analyzed, median follow-up was just 6.2 months in the experimental arm, and median overall survival had not been reached for patients treated with vemurafenib.

                The FDA also considered the currently reported phase-II trial, which included 132 patients with stage-IV melanoma that had progressed despite at least one systemic treatment. Tumor tissue from 56% of patients screened for the trial had a BRAFV600 mutation, which was required for study entry. Vemurafenib is a potent kinase inhibitor that was developed to target this mutation within cancer cells specifically.

                Patients in the study were given oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) and followed every 6 weeks for disease progression at 10 medical centers in the United States and 3 in Australia. Median follow-up for efficacy was 13 months (range, 0.6-20 months). Treatment response was assessed by both the investigative team and by a blinded independent review committee.

                The committee found that 8 patients (6%) showed a complete response and 62 (47%) showed a partial response to vemurafenib, for an overall response rate of 53%. A total of 38 patients (29%) showed stable disease. Only 18 (14%) showed progressive disease; 6 patients could not be assessed.

                Dr. Sosman and his colleagues found a 5% complete response rate and a 52% partial response rate, for an overall response rate of 57%, which generally accorded with the independent review committee’s findings.

                Molecular sequencing showed 122 patients in the trial had BRAFV600E mutations and 10 patients had BRAFV600K mutations. Four of the 10 patients with the BRAFV600K mutation had a partial response and 3 had stable disease.

                These response rates are higher than those associated with any previous treatments for advanced melanoma, the researchers noted. The lowest response occurred in patients with an LDL level more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.

                The median duration of response was 6.7 months, and one-fourth of the subjects remained progression free for more than a year. Median overall survival was 16 months. At the time of the data cut-off (July 1, 2011), 62 patients (47% of the study population) were alive.

                “Most objective responses were evident at the time of the first set of scans (week 6), but in some patients, responses did not appear until the patient had been receiving the drug for more than 6 months,” the researchers said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:707-14).

                The longer follow-up in this study thus permitted the investigators to observe these late responses.

                Overall survival was 77% at 6 months and 58% at 12 months, and it was estimated to be 43% at 18 months, they noted.

                Until now, median overall of metastatic melanoma has been 6-10 months, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues noted. In previously untreated patients who responded to ipilimumab (Yervoy) – an immunotherapy also approved last year – it reached 11 months.

                Most patients had at least one adverse event related to vemurafenib, but most were not severe. Adverse effects chiefly were arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, and alopecia. Although many patients required dose interruptions (64%) or reductions (45%), “patients were able to receive most of their intended daily dose,” the investigators wrote.

                Four patients discontinued the study drug altogether, including one who developed a retinal-vein occlusion. Another patient died from rapidly progressive melanoma and renal failure that may have been related to the study drug.

                Vemurafenib is known to have the paradoxical effect of promoting cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas or keratoacanthomas, so the study subjects were closely monitored for these. Thirty-four patients (26%) developed such neoplasms, usually at the start of therapy. All were managed with resection and vemurafenib was not discontinued. Another eight patients were found to have basal cell carcinomas.

                “As with most targeted therapies that block a driver oncogene,” vemurafenib will likely encounter resistance with long-term use, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues said. The mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib are currently being investigated, so that strategies to prevent or overcome it can be devised.

                This study was funded by Hoffman-LaRoche. Dr. Sosman and his associates reported ties to various companies, including Abraxis, Altor, Amgen, BMS, Celldex, Genentech, Genesis Biopharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Plexxikon, Prometheus, Roche, and Serametrix.

                Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
                POW
                Participant

                  Thank you for your reply, lhaley, and especially for pasting that article.

                  I don't mean to argue with anyone here, but as a biochemist, I do feel an obligation to correct factual errors. I hope that your oncologist didn't really say that vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and Dabrafenib are the same. The two drugs are chemically different, and such differences can affect the drug's activity and ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. If you Google "vemurafenib structure" and "Dabrafenib structure" you can see the chemical differences for yourself.

                  AllyNTAus
                  Participant

                    And this is the reason that the side effects suffered by Zelboraf recipients and Dabrafenib recipients have been quite different from what I read – Zel seems to have caused quite a few more and more severe side effects. My doctor (overseeing my compassionate use of Dabrafenib) said they have only been able to put it down to the differing compounds that are used in the two medications to deliver the active component.

                    POW I didn't look up where you are, but I am in Australia, I access my Dabrafenib through the Westmead Hospital melanoma team headed by Professor Rick Kefford and Dr Georgina Long. I didn't qualify for the clinical trial of the BRAF/MEK combo, due to lung problems at the time I was being assessed, but was given compassionate access to Dabrafenib very quickly after it was determined I didn't qualify for the trial. So maybe you will need to search for somewhere where a trial is still open and contact the doctors there.

                    Best wishes to you and your brother, it does seem Dabrafenib has done some great things for people with brain mets.

                    Allison

                    POW
                    Participant

                      Hi, Allison-

                      Thank you! I am in the States, but your information is useful. At least I now know that "compassionate use" is possible! Can you tell me which clinical trial you were trying for? Is othere only one "BRAF/MEK" trial out there?

                      I'm glad that your lung problems seem to have subsided. I look forward to hearing more about your experiences with Dabrafenib. Best wishes to you! 

                      POW
                      Participant

                        Hi, Allison-

                        Thank you! I am in the States, but your information is useful. At least I now know that "compassionate use" is possible! Can you tell me which clinical trial you were trying for? Is othere only one "BRAF/MEK" trial out there?

                        I'm glad that your lung problems seem to have subsided. I look forward to hearing more about your experiences with Dabrafenib. Best wishes to you! 

                        POW
                        Participant

                          I FOUND IT! Thanks to the clue I received from Allison, I was able to track down how my brother's oncologist can apply for compassionate use of dabrafenib. Once I found the right place, GSK was very quick to provide me the information I needed. Thanks, everybody, and wish us luck! 

                          POW
                          Participant

                            I FOUND IT! Thanks to the clue I received from Allison, I was able to track down how my brother's oncologist can apply for compassionate use of dabrafenib. Once I found the right place, GSK was very quick to provide me the information I needed. Thanks, everybody, and wish us luck! 

                            AllyNTAus
                            Participant
                              That’s great POW, glad I was of some help. Hope your brother is able to get onto it and get a good response.

                              I was feeling really positive about Dabrafenib until today, I have had a bit of intermittent aching in the left armpit, similar to what I had felt earlier in the year in my right armpit just before a small lump appeared (suspected invaded lymph node that shrunk away really quickly after I started the drug), and today I felt a small lump in the left armpit. I am due for scans next Weds, very scared it will show disease progression after only 5 months on Dabrafenib, I couldn’t be that unlucky! I know the response periods are very variable but I have felt so well! Hoping against hope it will not turn out to be melanoma progression.

                              AllyNTAus
                              Participant
                                That’s great POW, glad I was of some help. Hope your brother is able to get onto it and get a good response.

                                I was feeling really positive about Dabrafenib until today, I have had a bit of intermittent aching in the left armpit, similar to what I had felt earlier in the year in my right armpit just before a small lump appeared (suspected invaded lymph node that shrunk away really quickly after I started the drug), and today I felt a small lump in the left armpit. I am due for scans next Weds, very scared it will show disease progression after only 5 months on Dabrafenib, I couldn’t be that unlucky! I know the response periods are very variable but I have felt so well! Hoping against hope it will not turn out to be melanoma progression.

                                AllyNTAus
                                Participant
                                  That’s great POW, glad I was of some help. Hope your brother is able to get onto it and get a good response.

                                  I was feeling really positive about Dabrafenib until today, I have had a bit of intermittent aching in the left armpit, similar to what I had felt earlier in the year in my right armpit just before a small lump appeared (suspected invaded lymph node that shrunk away really quickly after I started the drug), and today I felt a small lump in the left armpit. I am due for scans next Weds, very scared it will show disease progression after only 5 months on Dabrafenib, I couldn’t be that unlucky! I know the response periods are very variable but I have felt so well! Hoping against hope it will not turn out to be melanoma progression.

                                  POW
                                  Participant

                                    I FOUND IT! Thanks to the clue I received from Allison, I was able to track down how my brother's oncologist can apply for compassionate use of dabrafenib. Once I found the right place, GSK was very quick to provide me the information I needed. Thanks, everybody, and wish us luck! 

                                    POW
                                    Participant

                                      Hi, Allison-

                                      Thank you! I am in the States, but your information is useful. At least I now know that "compassionate use" is possible! Can you tell me which clinical trial you were trying for? Is othere only one "BRAF/MEK" trial out there?

                                      I'm glad that your lung problems seem to have subsided. I look forward to hearing more about your experiences with Dabrafenib. Best wishes to you! 

                                      AllyNTAus
                                      Participant

                                        And this is the reason that the side effects suffered by Zelboraf recipients and Dabrafenib recipients have been quite different from what I read – Zel seems to have caused quite a few more and more severe side effects. My doctor (overseeing my compassionate use of Dabrafenib) said they have only been able to put it down to the differing compounds that are used in the two medications to deliver the active component.

                                        POW I didn't look up where you are, but I am in Australia, I access my Dabrafenib through the Westmead Hospital melanoma team headed by Professor Rick Kefford and Dr Georgina Long. I didn't qualify for the clinical trial of the BRAF/MEK combo, due to lung problems at the time I was being assessed, but was given compassionate access to Dabrafenib very quickly after it was determined I didn't qualify for the trial. So maybe you will need to search for somewhere where a trial is still open and contact the doctors there.

                                        Best wishes to you and your brother, it does seem Dabrafenib has done some great things for people with brain mets.

                                        Allison

                                        AllyNTAus
                                        Participant

                                          And this is the reason that the side effects suffered by Zelboraf recipients and Dabrafenib recipients have been quite different from what I read – Zel seems to have caused quite a few more and more severe side effects. My doctor (overseeing my compassionate use of Dabrafenib) said they have only been able to put it down to the differing compounds that are used in the two medications to deliver the active component.

                                          POW I didn't look up where you are, but I am in Australia, I access my Dabrafenib through the Westmead Hospital melanoma team headed by Professor Rick Kefford and Dr Georgina Long. I didn't qualify for the clinical trial of the BRAF/MEK combo, due to lung problems at the time I was being assessed, but was given compassionate access to Dabrafenib very quickly after it was determined I didn't qualify for the trial. So maybe you will need to search for somewhere where a trial is still open and contact the doctors there.

                                          Best wishes to you and your brother, it does seem Dabrafenib has done some great things for people with brain mets.

                                          Allison

                                          POW
                                          Participant

                                            Thank you for your reply, lhaley, and especially for pasting that article.

                                            I don't mean to argue with anyone here, but as a biochemist, I do feel an obligation to correct factual errors. I hope that your oncologist didn't really say that vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and Dabrafenib are the same. The two drugs are chemically different, and such differences can affect the drug's activity and ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. If you Google "vemurafenib structure" and "Dabrafenib structure" you can see the chemical differences for yourself.

                                            POW
                                            Participant

                                              Thank you for your reply, lhaley, and especially for pasting that article.

                                              I don't mean to argue with anyone here, but as a biochemist, I do feel an obligation to correct factual errors. I hope that your oncologist didn't really say that vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and Dabrafenib are the same. The two drugs are chemically different, and such differences can affect the drug's activity and ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. If you Google "vemurafenib structure" and "Dabrafenib structure" you can see the chemical differences for yourself.

                                              lhaley
                                              Participant

                                                I was just recently in a Zelboraf trial that is across the country for brain mets.  I got out of the trial because they were making them redo the biopsy(b-raf) because mine was 2 years old and it was going to take a few more years.   When they originally did the statistics they discovered that zelboraf did pass through the brain barrier.  They are now re-doing the the brain part of the trial to have the scientic info to back the info.   I was put on the trial for several brain mets. 

                                                I have asked my mel oncologist several times for the difference between zelboraf and and dabrafenib and he has just explained it as one being the generic of the opposite.  I might be misunderstanding some of this.  I found this artlicle that James from Sydney had posted several months ago.  I could not link it correctly but have cut and pasted.

                                                 

                                                 

                                                A phase-II clinical trial with the longest follow-up to date confirmed that vemurafenib induces a clinical response in more than half of patients with advanced melanoma expressing BRAFV600 mutations, according to a report in the Feb. 23 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

                                                Median overall survival was 16 months in these patients, who had highly unfavorable characteristics at baseline. With follow-up as long as 20 months, this study “provides critical information on long-term survival” that was not available from previous studies of vemurafenib (Zelboraf) in metastatic melanoma, said Dr. Jeffrey A. Sosman of the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and his associates.

                                                The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved vemurafenib on Aug. 17, 2011 for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. The FDA acted after a pivotal phase-III trial showed vemurafenib improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine. When the phase-III data were analyzed, median follow-up was just 6.2 months in the experimental arm, and median overall survival had not been reached for patients treated with vemurafenib.

                                                The FDA also considered the currently reported phase-II trial, which included 132 patients with stage-IV melanoma that had progressed despite at least one systemic treatment. Tumor tissue from 56% of patients screened for the trial had a BRAFV600 mutation, which was required for study entry. Vemurafenib is a potent kinase inhibitor that was developed to target this mutation within cancer cells specifically.

                                                Patients in the study were given oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) and followed every 6 weeks for disease progression at 10 medical centers in the United States and 3 in Australia. Median follow-up for efficacy was 13 months (range, 0.6-20 months). Treatment response was assessed by both the investigative team and by a blinded independent review committee.

                                                The committee found that 8 patients (6%) showed a complete response and 62 (47%) showed a partial response to vemurafenib, for an overall response rate of 53%. A total of 38 patients (29%) showed stable disease. Only 18 (14%) showed progressive disease; 6 patients could not be assessed.

                                                Dr. Sosman and his colleagues found a 5% complete response rate and a 52% partial response rate, for an overall response rate of 57%, which generally accorded with the independent review committee’s findings.

                                                Molecular sequencing showed 122 patients in the trial had BRAFV600E mutations and 10 patients had BRAFV600K mutations. Four of the 10 patients with the BRAFV600K mutation had a partial response and 3 had stable disease.

                                                These response rates are higher than those associated with any previous treatments for advanced melanoma, the researchers noted. The lowest response occurred in patients with an LDL level more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.

                                                The median duration of response was 6.7 months, and one-fourth of the subjects remained progression free for more than a year. Median overall survival was 16 months. At the time of the data cut-off (July 1, 2011), 62 patients (47% of the study population) were alive.

                                                “Most objective responses were evident at the time of the first set of scans (week 6), but in some patients, responses did not appear until the patient had been receiving the drug for more than 6 months,” the researchers said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:707-14).

                                                The longer follow-up in this study thus permitted the investigators to observe these late responses.

                                                Overall survival was 77% at 6 months and 58% at 12 months, and it was estimated to be 43% at 18 months, they noted.

                                                Until now, median overall of metastatic melanoma has been 6-10 months, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues noted. In previously untreated patients who responded to ipilimumab (Yervoy) – an immunotherapy also approved last year – it reached 11 months.

                                                Most patients had at least one adverse event related to vemurafenib, but most were not severe. Adverse effects chiefly were arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, and alopecia. Although many patients required dose interruptions (64%) or reductions (45%), “patients were able to receive most of their intended daily dose,” the investigators wrote.

                                                Four patients discontinued the study drug altogether, including one who developed a retinal-vein occlusion. Another patient died from rapidly progressive melanoma and renal failure that may have been related to the study drug.

                                                Vemurafenib is known to have the paradoxical effect of promoting cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas or keratoacanthomas, so the study subjects were closely monitored for these. Thirty-four patients (26%) developed such neoplasms, usually at the start of therapy. All were managed with resection and vemurafenib was not discontinued. Another eight patients were found to have basal cell carcinomas.

                                                “As with most targeted therapies that block a driver oncogene,” vemurafenib will likely encounter resistance with long-term use, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues said. The mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib are currently being investigated, so that strategies to prevent or overcome it can be devised.

                                                This study was funded by Hoffman-LaRoche. Dr. Sosman and his associates reported ties to various companies, including Abraxis, Altor, Amgen, BMS, Celldex, Genentech, Genesis Biopharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Plexxikon, Prometheus, Roche, and Serametrix.

                                                Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
                                                lhaley
                                                Participant

                                                  I was just recently in a Zelboraf trial that is across the country for brain mets.  I got out of the trial because they were making them redo the biopsy(b-raf) because mine was 2 years old and it was going to take a few more years.   When they originally did the statistics they discovered that zelboraf did pass through the brain barrier.  They are now re-doing the the brain part of the trial to have the scientic info to back the info.   I was put on the trial for several brain mets. 

                                                  I have asked my mel oncologist several times for the difference between zelboraf and and dabrafenib and he has just explained it as one being the generic of the opposite.  I might be misunderstanding some of this.  I found this artlicle that James from Sydney had posted several months ago.  I could not link it correctly but have cut and pasted.

                                                   

                                                   

                                                  A phase-II clinical trial with the longest follow-up to date confirmed that vemurafenib induces a clinical response in more than half of patients with advanced melanoma expressing BRAFV600 mutations, according to a report in the Feb. 23 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

                                                  Median overall survival was 16 months in these patients, who had highly unfavorable characteristics at baseline. With follow-up as long as 20 months, this study “provides critical information on long-term survival” that was not available from previous studies of vemurafenib (Zelboraf) in metastatic melanoma, said Dr. Jeffrey A. Sosman of the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and his associates.

                                                  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved vemurafenib on Aug. 17, 2011 for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. The FDA acted after a pivotal phase-III trial showed vemurafenib improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine. When the phase-III data were analyzed, median follow-up was just 6.2 months in the experimental arm, and median overall survival had not been reached for patients treated with vemurafenib.

                                                  The FDA also considered the currently reported phase-II trial, which included 132 patients with stage-IV melanoma that had progressed despite at least one systemic treatment. Tumor tissue from 56% of patients screened for the trial had a BRAFV600 mutation, which was required for study entry. Vemurafenib is a potent kinase inhibitor that was developed to target this mutation within cancer cells specifically.

                                                  Patients in the study were given oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) and followed every 6 weeks for disease progression at 10 medical centers in the United States and 3 in Australia. Median follow-up for efficacy was 13 months (range, 0.6-20 months). Treatment response was assessed by both the investigative team and by a blinded independent review committee.

                                                  The committee found that 8 patients (6%) showed a complete response and 62 (47%) showed a partial response to vemurafenib, for an overall response rate of 53%. A total of 38 patients (29%) showed stable disease. Only 18 (14%) showed progressive disease; 6 patients could not be assessed.

                                                  Dr. Sosman and his colleagues found a 5% complete response rate and a 52% partial response rate, for an overall response rate of 57%, which generally accorded with the independent review committee’s findings.

                                                  Molecular sequencing showed 122 patients in the trial had BRAFV600E mutations and 10 patients had BRAFV600K mutations. Four of the 10 patients with the BRAFV600K mutation had a partial response and 3 had stable disease.

                                                  These response rates are higher than those associated with any previous treatments for advanced melanoma, the researchers noted. The lowest response occurred in patients with an LDL level more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.

                                                  The median duration of response was 6.7 months, and one-fourth of the subjects remained progression free for more than a year. Median overall survival was 16 months. At the time of the data cut-off (July 1, 2011), 62 patients (47% of the study population) were alive.

                                                  “Most objective responses were evident at the time of the first set of scans (week 6), but in some patients, responses did not appear until the patient had been receiving the drug for more than 6 months,” the researchers said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:707-14).

                                                  The longer follow-up in this study thus permitted the investigators to observe these late responses.

                                                  Overall survival was 77% at 6 months and 58% at 12 months, and it was estimated to be 43% at 18 months, they noted.

                                                  Until now, median overall of metastatic melanoma has been 6-10 months, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues noted. In previously untreated patients who responded to ipilimumab (Yervoy) – an immunotherapy also approved last year – it reached 11 months.

                                                  Most patients had at least one adverse event related to vemurafenib, but most were not severe. Adverse effects chiefly were arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, and alopecia. Although many patients required dose interruptions (64%) or reductions (45%), “patients were able to receive most of their intended daily dose,” the investigators wrote.

                                                  Four patients discontinued the study drug altogether, including one who developed a retinal-vein occlusion. Another patient died from rapidly progressive melanoma and renal failure that may have been related to the study drug.

                                                  Vemurafenib is known to have the paradoxical effect of promoting cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas or keratoacanthomas, so the study subjects were closely monitored for these. Thirty-four patients (26%) developed such neoplasms, usually at the start of therapy. All were managed with resection and vemurafenib was not discontinued. Another eight patients were found to have basal cell carcinomas.

                                                  “As with most targeted therapies that block a driver oncogene,” vemurafenib will likely encounter resistance with long-term use, Dr. Sosman and his colleagues said. The mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib are currently being investigated, so that strategies to prevent or overcome it can be devised.

                                                  This study was funded by Hoffman-LaRoche. Dr. Sosman and his associates reported ties to various companies, including Abraxis, Altor, Amgen, BMS, Celldex, Genentech, Genesis Biopharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Plexxikon, Prometheus, Roche, and Serametrix.

                                                  Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
                                                  POW
                                                  Participant

                                                    They are chemically very similar but not identical. Dabrafenib is known to cross the blood-brain barrier and shink brain tumors. Nobody knows if Zelboraf gets into the brain or not and brain tumors are my brother's biggest problem. There are ongoing clinical trials to test Zelboraf on brain tumors, but my brother has been excluded from them. Hence me looking into possible compassionate use for Dabrafenib.

                                                    POW
                                                    Participant

                                                      They are chemically very similar but not identical. Dabrafenib is known to cross the blood-brain barrier and shink brain tumors. Nobody knows if Zelboraf gets into the brain or not and brain tumors are my brother's biggest problem. There are ongoing clinical trials to test Zelboraf on brain tumors, but my brother has been excluded from them. Hence me looking into possible compassionate use for Dabrafenib.

                                                    lhaley
                                                    Participant

                                                      What I understand is that Zelboraf and Dabrafebin are basically the same.

                                                      lhaley
                                                      Participant

                                                        What I understand is that Zelboraf and Dabrafebin are basically the same.

                                                    Viewing 2 reply threads
                                                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                                    About the MRF Patient Forum

                                                    The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                                    The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                                                    Popular Topics