› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Confused about diagnosis
- This topic has 12 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Raoulduke212.
- Post
-
- May 12, 2015 at 10:51 pm
I had a odd looking mole biopsied. I only spoke to the nurse, but she told me the pathology came back as "Severely Atypical Lentiginous Junctional Melanocytic Proliferation." She says it's not cancer but when I google this term, I get nothing but melanoma articles. Can someone explain this to me?
- Replies
-
-
- May 12, 2015 at 11:42 pm
This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus. It is NOT melanoma. However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ). This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma. Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE. Anything changing should be shown to your derm. Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:14 am
Oh boy that's sobering. Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:37 am
There is no way to know that for certain. Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change. It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens. Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma. It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist. Again, watch for CHANGE! Take pictures if that helps.
-
- May 13, 2015 at 6:03 pm
I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?
-
- May 13, 2015 at 6:03 pm
I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?
-
- May 13, 2015 at 6:03 pm
I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:37 am
There is no way to know that for certain. Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change. It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens. Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma. It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist. Again, watch for CHANGE! Take pictures if that helps.
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:37 am
There is no way to know that for certain. Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change. It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens. Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma. It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist. Again, watch for CHANGE! Take pictures if that helps.
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:14 am
Oh boy that's sobering. Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?
-
- May 13, 2015 at 12:14 am
Oh boy that's sobering. Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?
-
- May 12, 2015 at 11:42 pm
This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus. It is NOT melanoma. However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ). This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma. Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE. Anything changing should be shown to your derm. Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.
-
- May 12, 2015 at 11:42 pm
This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus. It is NOT melanoma. However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ). This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma. Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE. Anything changing should be shown to your derm. Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.