Can’t we have the number of views back?

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Can’t we have the number of views back?

  • Post
    • December 26, 2013 at 3:22 pm
    lou2
    Participant

      The counts went crazy, so that feature was apparently removed.  Now we are speaking to a blank wall. 

      Couldn't we have this feature fixed?  It gives a sense of community to know people are out there.  Otherwise, there are only a few replies, or none at all and you wonder: Is anyone there?  Without these counts, who knows?

    Viewing 5 reply threads
    • Replies
        • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
        casagrayson
        Participant

          I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

          • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
          casagrayson
          Participant

            I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

            • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
            casagrayson
            Participant

              I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

              • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
              JerryfromFauq
              Participant

                I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

                 

                • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
                JerryfromFauq
                Participant

                  I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

                   

                  • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
                  JerryfromFauq
                  Participant

                    I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

                     

                      • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
                      Cooper
                      Participant

                        I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

                        • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
                        Cooper
                        Participant

                          I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

                          • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
                          Cooper
                          Participant

                            I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

                            • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
                            JerryfromFauq
                            Participant

                              The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

                               

                              • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
                              JerryfromFauq
                              Participant

                                The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

                                 

                                • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
                                JerryfromFauq
                                Participant

                                  The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

                                   

                            Viewing 5 reply threads
                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                            About the MRF Patient Forum

                            The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                            The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                            Popular Topics