› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Doc says no SNB if FISH test comes back negative
- This topic has 12 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 3 months ago by
Lil0909.
- Post
-
- October 31, 2014 at 5:07 pm
To date, my 8yo son has only had the mole on his scalp removed by the dermatoloist. (Initial pathology yielded "spitzoid melanoma" – Clark IV, Breslow 2.1 mm, 3/mm mitotic rate).
Next, we're discussing the plan of action with Oncology/Plastic Surgery/Pathology. They're tentatively scheduling surgery for Nov 7th. Today, the Oncologist said if the FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) test comes back negative, they'll only do a re-excision. If it's positive, they'll do the wide excision AND SNB. They have a concensus that the tissue is "borderline" melanoma.
Thoughts? Anyone have negative FISH results, but had problems down the road?
- Replies
-
-
- October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
Negative FISH test basically says it is benign. So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes? Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.
In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date. The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
Negative FISH test basically says it is benign. So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes? Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.
In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date. The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
Negative FISH test basically says it is benign. So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes? Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.
In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date. The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE if its is neganitve.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE if its is neganitve.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE if its is neganitve.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes. Now Stage 3a.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes. Now Stage 3a.
-
- October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes. Now Stage 3a.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.