› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Phase I Pembro and IDO inhibitor combo trial
- This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
RJoeyB.
- Post
-
- September 20, 2014 at 2:49 am
I saw this trial mentioned on another forum. Don't have any details other than the clinical trials website. Phase I is for many different types of cancer including melanoma. Phase II is only going to be for NSCLC. I think it sounds like a very interesting concept.
Here's the clinical trials website link:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02178722
Here's a little information on what IDO is all about:
https://www.sitcancer.org/meetings/am09/presentations/fri/Munn.pdf
- Replies
-
-
- September 20, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Dear Brian I think this is probably the first trial looking at anti-pd1 and an IDO inhibitor. There is data on IPI and the same IDO inhibitor. Dr. Weber had some positive things to say about it at a conference in July. There was a 56% response rate. Here is the link:http://www.primeoncology.org/online_education/solid_tumor/2014/paris-melanoma-webcast/weber-activity.aspx?authenticator=%3CLOGINID%3Ebrentsmorris@epbfi.com%3C/LOGINID%3E%3CDATE%3E9/19/2014%2010:37:21%20AM%3C/DATE%3E%3CUSERTOKEN%3E%3C!%5BCDATA%5BDk2ap87VgXUhAJD2gi/Qn+0VQFs=%5D%5D%3E%3C/USERTOKEN%3E
-
- September 20, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Dear Brian I think this is probably the first trial looking at anti-pd1 and an IDO inhibitor. There is data on IPI and the same IDO inhibitor. Dr. Weber had some positive things to say about it at a conference in July. There was a 56% response rate. Here is the link:http://www.primeoncology.org/online_education/solid_tumor/2014/paris-melanoma-webcast/weber-activity.aspx?authenticator=%3CLOGINID%3Ebrentsmorris@epbfi.com%3C/LOGINID%3E%3CDATE%3E9/19/2014%2010:37:21%20AM%3C/DATE%3E%3CUSERTOKEN%3E%3C!%5BCDATA%5BDk2ap87VgXUhAJD2gi/Qn+0VQFs=%5D%5D%3E%3C/USERTOKEN%3E
-
- September 20, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Dear Brian I think this is probably the first trial looking at anti-pd1 and an IDO inhibitor. There is data on IPI and the same IDO inhibitor. Dr. Weber had some positive things to say about it at a conference in July. There was a 56% response rate. Here is the link:http://www.primeoncology.org/online_education/solid_tumor/2014/paris-melanoma-webcast/weber-activity.aspx?authenticator=%3CLOGINID%3Ebrentsmorris@epbfi.com%3C/LOGINID%3E%3CDATE%3E9/19/2014%2010:37:21%20AM%3C/DATE%3E%3CUSERTOKEN%3E%3C!%5BCDATA%5BDk2ap87VgXUhAJD2gi/Qn+0VQFs=%5D%5D%3E%3C/USERTOKEN%3E
-
- September 21, 2014 at 11:05 pm
Interesting. Seems that most of the IDO studies for melanoma have been combinations. When I did ipi, it was initially supposed to be for an ipi-IDO combo phase I/II, there were like 2 spots left out of 10 at my trial site, but a few days after signing the trial papers, I found out I was excluded because of my prior TIL (the eligibility criteria were vague when it came to prior immunotherapies… prior ipi was an exclusion, prior IL-2 was not, and everything else wasn't clear, but the pharma coordinator decided TIL was an exclusion). I was initially disappointed but once I thought about it, we had started thinking I was just doing ipi, the IDO was a surprise "added bonus", so I ended up doing ipi anyway. Regardless, good to see another front being opened with IDO and the checkpoint inhibitors. Thanks for sharing Brian.
Joe
-
- September 21, 2014 at 11:05 pm
Interesting. Seems that most of the IDO studies for melanoma have been combinations. When I did ipi, it was initially supposed to be for an ipi-IDO combo phase I/II, there were like 2 spots left out of 10 at my trial site, but a few days after signing the trial papers, I found out I was excluded because of my prior TIL (the eligibility criteria were vague when it came to prior immunotherapies… prior ipi was an exclusion, prior IL-2 was not, and everything else wasn't clear, but the pharma coordinator decided TIL was an exclusion). I was initially disappointed but once I thought about it, we had started thinking I was just doing ipi, the IDO was a surprise "added bonus", so I ended up doing ipi anyway. Regardless, good to see another front being opened with IDO and the checkpoint inhibitors. Thanks for sharing Brian.
Joe
-
- September 21, 2014 at 11:05 pm
Interesting. Seems that most of the IDO studies for melanoma have been combinations. When I did ipi, it was initially supposed to be for an ipi-IDO combo phase I/II, there were like 2 spots left out of 10 at my trial site, but a few days after signing the trial papers, I found out I was excluded because of my prior TIL (the eligibility criteria were vague when it came to prior immunotherapies… prior ipi was an exclusion, prior IL-2 was not, and everything else wasn't clear, but the pharma coordinator decided TIL was an exclusion). I was initially disappointed but once I thought about it, we had started thinking I was just doing ipi, the IDO was a surprise "added bonus", so I ended up doing ipi anyway. Regardless, good to see another front being opened with IDO and the checkpoint inhibitors. Thanks for sharing Brian.
Joe
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.