Vaccines Before Interleukin Treatment – May Boost Survival

Forums General Melanoma Community Vaccines Before Interleukin Treatment – May Boost Survival

  • Post
Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Replies
      POW
      Participant

        Very promising approach, Jerry. Thanks for shaing the link. For those who are interested, the complete article can be found here.

        Please note that this study refers to vaccines MADE FROM ONE'S OWN CELLS. It does not refer to other melanoma vaccines like GP100. The authors ackknowledge that this report is very preliminary and that they were only working with a small subset of patients. They only looked at patients who received IL-2. However, they also suggest that adding an autologous cell vaccine (i.e., one made from your own cells) might boost reponses to other immune-based treatments like ipi and anti-PD1. Interesting thought. As usual with scientific papers, "more research is required". 

          tschmith
          Participant

            I am starting IL2 on Feb 9th at UVA with Dr. Geoffrey Weiss.  Dr. Lipson from Hopkins fully supports IL2 but is trying to get me into a trial at NIH similar to what it talked about in this article….looks so promising.  It's always a challenge with me because I had one small brain met a year ago and also had to be on Steroids while after my pituitary gland decided it didn't care for Ipi and decided not to make Cortisol.  However, my pituitary gland recovered. 

            Thank you for sharing this article….gives me so much hope!

            Terrie

            tschmith
            Participant

              I am starting IL2 on Feb 9th at UVA with Dr. Geoffrey Weiss.  Dr. Lipson from Hopkins fully supports IL2 but is trying to get me into a trial at NIH similar to what it talked about in this article….looks so promising.  It's always a challenge with me because I had one small brain met a year ago and also had to be on Steroids while after my pituitary gland decided it didn't care for Ipi and decided not to make Cortisol.  However, my pituitary gland recovered. 

              Thank you for sharing this article….gives me so much hope!

              Terrie

              tschmith
              Participant

                I am starting IL2 on Feb 9th at UVA with Dr. Geoffrey Weiss.  Dr. Lipson from Hopkins fully supports IL2 but is trying to get me into a trial at NIH similar to what it talked about in this article….looks so promising.  It's always a challenge with me because I had one small brain met a year ago and also had to be on Steroids while after my pituitary gland decided it didn't care for Ipi and decided not to make Cortisol.  However, my pituitary gland recovered. 

                Thank you for sharing this article….gives me so much hope!

                Terrie

                Phil S
                Participant

                  So, in the past, if you got a vaccine made for you, you had to be HLAA2 positive, which my husband isn't!! Do you know if you will need to be positive to do this treatment?? I am always interested in adding things to IL2 for longer response rates.  Valerie (Phil's wife)

                  POW
                  Participant

                    My immunogenetics is pretty rusty, so I may be wrong here. However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. Stimulating your immune system with a vaccine won't do any good. If the approach discussed in this paper gains traction, I'll go back and read up on immunogenetics again so I can share the latest information. (UGH! I find immunogenetics complex and boring.)

                    POW
                    Participant

                      My immunogenetics is pretty rusty, so I may be wrong here. However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. Stimulating your immune system with a vaccine won't do any good. If the approach discussed in this paper gains traction, I'll go back and read up on immunogenetics again so I can share the latest information. (UGH! I find immunogenetics complex and boring.)

                      POW
                      Participant

                        My immunogenetics is pretty rusty, so I may be wrong here. However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. Stimulating your immune system with a vaccine won't do any good. If the approach discussed in this paper gains traction, I'll go back and read up on immunogenetics again so I can share the latest information. (UGH! I find immunogenetics complex and boring.)

                        JerryfromFauq
                        Participant

                          I'm not HLA-A2 positive either.  The only place this article – http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cbr.2013.1565– (Thanks POW) mentions HLA is where it says "In a 185-patient randomized trial, administering the HLA-A2–restricted gp100 peptide with high-dose IL2 was associated with a higher response rate, better progression-free survival, and better overall survival compared with high-dose IL2 alone.15 For more than 20 years, we have been testing cancer vaccines using short-term autologous term cell lines as the antigen source.16 Knowing that many of our IL2 patients had also received treatment with these vaccines as active specific immunotherapy (ASI), made us wonder if vaccine treatment had contributed to the 20% 5-year survival rate observed in patients who had received IL2."   

                                At several other places they mention the gp100, but it is not clear to me what part of the study was gp100 (HLA-A2) verses another vacine.

                          JerryfromFauq
                          Participant
                            POW, any idea how the following relates to HLA?
                            ASI products utilized autologous tumor cell (TC) antigens derived from short-term cell cultures.
                             
                            The first ASI product consisted of irradiated autologous TC administered
                            with various adjuvants, especially interferon-c and granu-locyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (BB-IND 9212).
                             
                            The second ASI product consisted of autologous dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with irradiated autologous TC suspended in GM-CSF (DC/TC) (BB-IND
                            8554).
                            TC and DC/TC subsequently were compared in a randomized trial in which both products were suspended in GM-CSF. 
                             
                            In all three trials, the schedule of subcutaneous vaccine injections was weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. TC patients received a median of 10 million cells (range 2–24 million) per injection; whereas DC/TC patients received a median of 15 million cells (range 4–35 million) per injection.
                            POW
                            Participant

                              Jerry, our immune systems have a lot of different ways to attack and kill "foreign" organisms like viruses, bacteria and some types of cancer. We have antibodies, macrophages, killer T-cells and other armaments. The most effective weapon for killing melanoma is our "killer T-cells", also called "CD8+ T-cells". 

                              The paragraphs you pasted above are describing the ways in which various researchers have tried to increase the number of melanoma-specific killer T cells in the patient by culturing the patient's own T-cells ("autologous" means "self") with a melanoma vaccine developed from their own melanoma cells. Then they put the cultured cells back into the patient with additional vaccination of the patient in the hopes of killing the melanoma. 

                              The trick is that the immune system is a little more complex than that (well, OK, a lot more complex than that). The interaction between killer T cells and cancer cells is like Velcro. Velcro comes as two strips; one strip is covered in hooks and the other strip is covered with loops. When you put the two strips of velcro together, they stick. Killer T cells are covered with hooks, target cancer cells are covered with loops called HLA-A2. You need both to get the killer cells to stick to and kill the cancer. If one's cancer cells do not have the HLA-A2 protein on their surface, the killer cells will not work no matter how many there are.

                              As a somewhat hair-raising side note, I recall reading some papers that say that melanoma can actually stop producing HLA-A2 so as to deliberately evade immune attack.  Scarey to think about.

                              POW
                              Participant

                                Jerry, our immune systems have a lot of different ways to attack and kill "foreign" organisms like viruses, bacteria and some types of cancer. We have antibodies, macrophages, killer T-cells and other armaments. The most effective weapon for killing melanoma is our "killer T-cells", also called "CD8+ T-cells". 

                                The paragraphs you pasted above are describing the ways in which various researchers have tried to increase the number of melanoma-specific killer T cells in the patient by culturing the patient's own T-cells ("autologous" means "self") with a melanoma vaccine developed from their own melanoma cells. Then they put the cultured cells back into the patient with additional vaccination of the patient in the hopes of killing the melanoma. 

                                The trick is that the immune system is a little more complex than that (well, OK, a lot more complex than that). The interaction between killer T cells and cancer cells is like Velcro. Velcro comes as two strips; one strip is covered in hooks and the other strip is covered with loops. When you put the two strips of velcro together, they stick. Killer T cells are covered with hooks, target cancer cells are covered with loops called HLA-A2. You need both to get the killer cells to stick to and kill the cancer. If one's cancer cells do not have the HLA-A2 protein on their surface, the killer cells will not work no matter how many there are.

                                As a somewhat hair-raising side note, I recall reading some papers that say that melanoma can actually stop producing HLA-A2 so as to deliberately evade immune attack.  Scarey to think about.

                                Phil S
                                Participant

                                  Okay, all this stuff is way over my head!!  All I know for sure, is that I got depressed when I first found out that Phil was HLAA2 negative, thinking he wouldn't responded to as many treatments, and he would have less options!  However, Phil has had a wonderful response so far to TIL and his fighting T cells, still stable 20 months later! In Houston, TIL includes two full rounds of High Dose IL2. Wish we all knew the magic bullet!  Thanks for the information!  Valerie

                                  Phil S
                                  Participant

                                    Okay, all this stuff is way over my head!!  All I know for sure, is that I got depressed when I first found out that Phil was HLAA2 negative, thinking he wouldn't responded to as many treatments, and he would have less options!  However, Phil has had a wonderful response so far to TIL and his fighting T cells, still stable 20 months later! In Houston, TIL includes two full rounds of High Dose IL2. Wish we all knew the magic bullet!  Thanks for the information!  Valerie

                                    POW
                                    Participant

                                      OK, Valerie, your intriguing post made me go back and brush up on my immunogenetics. First off, let me say that I am delilghted that Phil is having such a good response to TIL. Second, I am pleased to stand corrected in regards to HLA-A2, especially when the correction involves such a happy outcome.

                                      As I expected, there has been a lot of progress in immunogenetics in the years since I was active in the field. HLA-A2 was the first (and is still the most important) gene identified that allows T-cells to kill melanoma. But now researchers know that there are several other, related genes that do that, too. One called HLA-C3 is just as good as HLA-A2. 

                                      So the bottom line for us is that your HLA type does affect your responsiveness to melanoma vaccines or to the TIL procedure, you do NOT have to be HLA-A2 positive– a few other types will work, too. Of course, Valerie and Phil could have told you that already. 😉

                                      POW
                                      Participant

                                        OK, Valerie, your intriguing post made me go back and brush up on my immunogenetics. First off, let me say that I am delilghted that Phil is having such a good response to TIL. Second, I am pleased to stand corrected in regards to HLA-A2, especially when the correction involves such a happy outcome.

                                        As I expected, there has been a lot of progress in immunogenetics in the years since I was active in the field. HLA-A2 was the first (and is still the most important) gene identified that allows T-cells to kill melanoma. But now researchers know that there are several other, related genes that do that, too. One called HLA-C3 is just as good as HLA-A2. 

                                        So the bottom line for us is that your HLA type does affect your responsiveness to melanoma vaccines or to the TIL procedure, you do NOT have to be HLA-A2 positive– a few other types will work, too. Of course, Valerie and Phil could have told you that already. 😉

                                        POW
                                        Participant

                                          OK, Valerie, your intriguing post made me go back and brush up on my immunogenetics. First off, let me say that I am delilghted that Phil is having such a good response to TIL. Second, I am pleased to stand corrected in regards to HLA-A2, especially when the correction involves such a happy outcome.

                                          As I expected, there has been a lot of progress in immunogenetics in the years since I was active in the field. HLA-A2 was the first (and is still the most important) gene identified that allows T-cells to kill melanoma. But now researchers know that there are several other, related genes that do that, too. One called HLA-C3 is just as good as HLA-A2. 

                                          So the bottom line for us is that your HLA type does affect your responsiveness to melanoma vaccines or to the TIL procedure, you do NOT have to be HLA-A2 positive– a few other types will work, too. Of course, Valerie and Phil could have told you that already. 😉

                                          Phil S
                                          Participant

                                            Okay, all this stuff is way over my head!!  All I know for sure, is that I got depressed when I first found out that Phil was HLAA2 negative, thinking he wouldn't responded to as many treatments, and he would have less options!  However, Phil has had a wonderful response so far to TIL and his fighting T cells, still stable 20 months later! In Houston, TIL includes two full rounds of High Dose IL2. Wish we all knew the magic bullet!  Thanks for the information!  Valerie

                                            POW
                                            Participant

                                              Jerry, our immune systems have a lot of different ways to attack and kill "foreign" organisms like viruses, bacteria and some types of cancer. We have antibodies, macrophages, killer T-cells and other armaments. The most effective weapon for killing melanoma is our "killer T-cells", also called "CD8+ T-cells". 

                                              The paragraphs you pasted above are describing the ways in which various researchers have tried to increase the number of melanoma-specific killer T cells in the patient by culturing the patient's own T-cells ("autologous" means "self") with a melanoma vaccine developed from their own melanoma cells. Then they put the cultured cells back into the patient with additional vaccination of the patient in the hopes of killing the melanoma. 

                                              The trick is that the immune system is a little more complex than that (well, OK, a lot more complex than that). The interaction between killer T cells and cancer cells is like Velcro. Velcro comes as two strips; one strip is covered in hooks and the other strip is covered with loops. When you put the two strips of velcro together, they stick. Killer T cells are covered with hooks, target cancer cells are covered with loops called HLA-A2. You need both to get the killer cells to stick to and kill the cancer. If one's cancer cells do not have the HLA-A2 protein on their surface, the killer cells will not work no matter how many there are.

                                              As a somewhat hair-raising side note, I recall reading some papers that say that melanoma can actually stop producing HLA-A2 so as to deliberately evade immune attack.  Scarey to think about.

                                              JerryfromFauq
                                              Participant
                                                POW, any idea how the following relates to HLA?
                                                ASI products utilized autologous tumor cell (TC) antigens derived from short-term cell cultures.
                                                 
                                                The first ASI product consisted of irradiated autologous TC administered
                                                with various adjuvants, especially interferon-c and granu-locyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (BB-IND 9212).
                                                 
                                                The second ASI product consisted of autologous dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with irradiated autologous TC suspended in GM-CSF (DC/TC) (BB-IND
                                                8554).
                                                TC and DC/TC subsequently were compared in a randomized trial in which both products were suspended in GM-CSF. 
                                                 
                                                In all three trials, the schedule of subcutaneous vaccine injections was weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. TC patients received a median of 10 million cells (range 2–24 million) per injection; whereas DC/TC patients received a median of 15 million cells (range 4–35 million) per injection.
                                                JerryfromFauq
                                                Participant
                                                  POW, any idea how the following relates to HLA?
                                                  ASI products utilized autologous tumor cell (TC) antigens derived from short-term cell cultures.
                                                   
                                                  The first ASI product consisted of irradiated autologous TC administered
                                                  with various adjuvants, especially interferon-c and granu-locyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (BB-IND 9212).
                                                   
                                                  The second ASI product consisted of autologous dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with irradiated autologous TC suspended in GM-CSF (DC/TC) (BB-IND
                                                  8554).
                                                  TC and DC/TC subsequently were compared in a randomized trial in which both products were suspended in GM-CSF. 
                                                   
                                                  In all three trials, the schedule of subcutaneous vaccine injections was weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. TC patients received a median of 10 million cells (range 2–24 million) per injection; whereas DC/TC patients received a median of 15 million cells (range 4–35 million) per injection.
                                                  JerryfromFauq
                                                  Participant

                                                    I'm not HLA-A2 positive either.  The only place this article – http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cbr.2013.1565– (Thanks POW) mentions HLA is where it says "In a 185-patient randomized trial, administering the HLA-A2–restricted gp100 peptide with high-dose IL2 was associated with a higher response rate, better progression-free survival, and better overall survival compared with high-dose IL2 alone.15 For more than 20 years, we have been testing cancer vaccines using short-term autologous term cell lines as the antigen source.16 Knowing that many of our IL2 patients had also received treatment with these vaccines as active specific immunotherapy (ASI), made us wonder if vaccine treatment had contributed to the 20% 5-year survival rate observed in patients who had received IL2."   

                                                          At several other places they mention the gp100, but it is not clear to me what part of the study was gp100 (HLA-A2) verses another vacine.

                                                    JerryfromFauq
                                                    Participant

                                                      I'm not HLA-A2 positive either.  The only place this article – http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cbr.2013.1565– (Thanks POW) mentions HLA is where it says "In a 185-patient randomized trial, administering the HLA-A2–restricted gp100 peptide with high-dose IL2 was associated with a higher response rate, better progression-free survival, and better overall survival compared with high-dose IL2 alone.15 For more than 20 years, we have been testing cancer vaccines using short-term autologous term cell lines as the antigen source.16 Knowing that many of our IL2 patients had also received treatment with these vaccines as active specific immunotherapy (ASI), made us wonder if vaccine treatment had contributed to the 20% 5-year survival rate observed in patients who had received IL2."   

                                                            At several other places they mention the gp100, but it is not clear to me what part of the study was gp100 (HLA-A2) verses another vacine.

                                                      Phil S
                                                      Participant

                                                        So, in the past, if you got a vaccine made for you, you had to be HLAA2 positive, which my husband isn't!! Do you know if you will need to be positive to do this treatment?? I am always interested in adding things to IL2 for longer response rates.  Valerie (Phil's wife)

                                                        Phil S
                                                        Participant

                                                          So, in the past, if you got a vaccine made for you, you had to be HLAA2 positive, which my husband isn't!! Do you know if you will need to be positive to do this treatment?? I am always interested in adding things to IL2 for longer response rates.  Valerie (Phil's wife)

                                                        POW
                                                        Participant

                                                          Very promising approach, Jerry. Thanks for shaing the link. For those who are interested, the complete article can be found here.

                                                          Please note that this study refers to vaccines MADE FROM ONE'S OWN CELLS. It does not refer to other melanoma vaccines like GP100. The authors ackknowledge that this report is very preliminary and that they were only working with a small subset of patients. They only looked at patients who received IL-2. However, they also suggest that adding an autologous cell vaccine (i.e., one made from your own cells) might boost reponses to other immune-based treatments like ipi and anti-PD1. Interesting thought. As usual with scientific papers, "more research is required". 

                                                          POW
                                                          Participant

                                                            Very promising approach, Jerry. Thanks for shaing the link. For those who are interested, the complete article can be found here.

                                                            Please note that this study refers to vaccines MADE FROM ONE'S OWN CELLS. It does not refer to other melanoma vaccines like GP100. The authors ackknowledge that this report is very preliminary and that they were only working with a small subset of patients. They only looked at patients who received IL-2. However, they also suggest that adding an autologous cell vaccine (i.e., one made from your own cells) might boost reponses to other immune-based treatments like ipi and anti-PD1. Interesting thought. As usual with scientific papers, "more research is required". 

                                                            Bubbles
                                                            Participant

                                                              POW,

                                                              With the advances in immunotherapies as treatment for melanoma…starting with interferon, then IL2, ipi, anti-PD1, vaccines, anti-PDL1…and others coming down the pike…this topic is too important for melanoma patients to fail to understand.  Your statement:

                                                              "However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. "

                                                              is not accurate and in fact, misleading.  All the therapies I listed above ARE immunotherapies. They all, in various ways, stimulate the patient's own immune system (specifically CD8+ T cells) to kill melanoma. Some people have HLA antigens on their melanoma cells that are HLA-A2.  Others have different HLA types.  It is completely dependent on the genetic makeup of the individual patient.  Vaccines using HLA-A2 antigen are common because it is a common antigen and the vaccines are designed specifically to use it.  Vaccines can be designed to use other HLA types.  Exclusions from trials based on HLA typing (like the anti-PD1/vaccine trial I completed) are based solely on the vaccine component, NOT whether the immunotherapy of anti-PD1 (Nivolumab) will fail on patients without HLA-A2.  In fact, in later arms of my same trial using Nivolumab but with NO vaccines…HLA typing was not required.  In sum….it is not necessary that your cancer cells be HLA-A2 positive for them "to be attacked and killed by your immune system"!!!!

                                                              An autologous vaccine goes around the HLA typing problem by matching the vaccine to the patient's own tumor cells precisely.  Again, clearly working (or at least having the chance to work) for that individual, though perhaps for no other. 

                                                              As an additional note…in a vaccine study by Slingluff, multi-peptide vaccines for melanoma were used that encompassed HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-A3.  All were effective in illiciting T-cell response.

                                                              Those without the specific HLA-A2 type should not give up hope for immunotherapies to work for them!!!!

                                                              Please speak to a melanoma specialist about your personal situation and treatments that may work for you. 

                                                              Celeste

                                                              Bubbles
                                                              Participant

                                                                POW,

                                                                With the advances in immunotherapies as treatment for melanoma…starting with interferon, then IL2, ipi, anti-PD1, vaccines, anti-PDL1…and others coming down the pike…this topic is too important for melanoma patients to fail to understand.  Your statement:

                                                                "However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. "

                                                                is not accurate and in fact, misleading.  All the therapies I listed above ARE immunotherapies. They all, in various ways, stimulate the patient's own immune system (specifically CD8+ T cells) to kill melanoma. Some people have HLA antigens on their melanoma cells that are HLA-A2.  Others have different HLA types.  It is completely dependent on the genetic makeup of the individual patient.  Vaccines using HLA-A2 antigen are common because it is a common antigen and the vaccines are designed specifically to use it.  Vaccines can be designed to use other HLA types.  Exclusions from trials based on HLA typing (like the anti-PD1/vaccine trial I completed) are based solely on the vaccine component, NOT whether the immunotherapy of anti-PD1 (Nivolumab) will fail on patients without HLA-A2.  In fact, in later arms of my same trial using Nivolumab but with NO vaccines…HLA typing was not required.  In sum….it is not necessary that your cancer cells be HLA-A2 positive for them "to be attacked and killed by your immune system"!!!!

                                                                An autologous vaccine goes around the HLA typing problem by matching the vaccine to the patient's own tumor cells precisely.  Again, clearly working (or at least having the chance to work) for that individual, though perhaps for no other. 

                                                                As an additional note…in a vaccine study by Slingluff, multi-peptide vaccines for melanoma were used that encompassed HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-A3.  All were effective in illiciting T-cell response.

                                                                Those without the specific HLA-A2 type should not give up hope for immunotherapies to work for them!!!!

                                                                Please speak to a melanoma specialist about your personal situation and treatments that may work for you. 

                                                                Celeste

                                                                  POW
                                                                  Participant

                                                                    You are absolutely correct, Celeste. The sentence you quoted was ill-concieved and poorly written and could well give people the wrong message. The immune system has a lot of different pathways it can use to attack and kill melanoma cells– HLA-A2 relates to only one or a few of those pathways. And, as I said above, I now know that there are other HLA antigens that are effective with melanoma vaccines, too. 

                                                                    Immunogenetics is a very complex field and researchers are learning more about it all the time. It is a challenge to share information on this forum so that people can understand what is going on without overwhelming them with jargon or inadvertent misinformation. That's why it's good to have several people reading and responding to each other's posts. Two (or 3 or 4) heads are better than one.

                                                                    POW
                                                                    Participant

                                                                      You are absolutely correct, Celeste. The sentence you quoted was ill-concieved and poorly written and could well give people the wrong message. The immune system has a lot of different pathways it can use to attack and kill melanoma cells– HLA-A2 relates to only one or a few of those pathways. And, as I said above, I now know that there are other HLA antigens that are effective with melanoma vaccines, too. 

                                                                      Immunogenetics is a very complex field and researchers are learning more about it all the time. It is a challenge to share information on this forum so that people can understand what is going on without overwhelming them with jargon or inadvertent misinformation. That's why it's good to have several people reading and responding to each other's posts. Two (or 3 or 4) heads are better than one.

                                                                      JerryfromFauq
                                                                      Participant

                                                                        Love it.

                                                                        JerryfromFauq
                                                                        Participant

                                                                          Love it.

                                                                          JerryfromFauq
                                                                          Participant

                                                                            Love it.

                                                                            POW
                                                                            Participant

                                                                              You are absolutely correct, Celeste. The sentence you quoted was ill-concieved and poorly written and could well give people the wrong message. The immune system has a lot of different pathways it can use to attack and kill melanoma cells– HLA-A2 relates to only one or a few of those pathways. And, as I said above, I now know that there are other HLA antigens that are effective with melanoma vaccines, too. 

                                                                              Immunogenetics is a very complex field and researchers are learning more about it all the time. It is a challenge to share information on this forum so that people can understand what is going on without overwhelming them with jargon or inadvertent misinformation. That's why it's good to have several people reading and responding to each other's posts. Two (or 3 or 4) heads are better than one.

                                                                            Bubbles
                                                                            Participant

                                                                              POW,

                                                                              With the advances in immunotherapies as treatment for melanoma…starting with interferon, then IL2, ipi, anti-PD1, vaccines, anti-PDL1…and others coming down the pike…this topic is too important for melanoma patients to fail to understand.  Your statement:

                                                                              "However, I think that for any cancer cells to be attacked and killed by your immune system, the cancer cells must be HLA-A2 positive. "

                                                                              is not accurate and in fact, misleading.  All the therapies I listed above ARE immunotherapies. They all, in various ways, stimulate the patient's own immune system (specifically CD8+ T cells) to kill melanoma. Some people have HLA antigens on their melanoma cells that are HLA-A2.  Others have different HLA types.  It is completely dependent on the genetic makeup of the individual patient.  Vaccines using HLA-A2 antigen are common because it is a common antigen and the vaccines are designed specifically to use it.  Vaccines can be designed to use other HLA types.  Exclusions from trials based on HLA typing (like the anti-PD1/vaccine trial I completed) are based solely on the vaccine component, NOT whether the immunotherapy of anti-PD1 (Nivolumab) will fail on patients without HLA-A2.  In fact, in later arms of my same trial using Nivolumab but with NO vaccines…HLA typing was not required.  In sum….it is not necessary that your cancer cells be HLA-A2 positive for them "to be attacked and killed by your immune system"!!!!

                                                                              An autologous vaccine goes around the HLA typing problem by matching the vaccine to the patient's own tumor cells precisely.  Again, clearly working (or at least having the chance to work) for that individual, though perhaps for no other. 

                                                                              As an additional note…in a vaccine study by Slingluff, multi-peptide vaccines for melanoma were used that encompassed HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-A3.  All were effective in illiciting T-cell response.

                                                                              Those without the specific HLA-A2 type should not give up hope for immunotherapies to work for them!!!!

                                                                              Please speak to a melanoma specialist about your personal situation and treatments that may work for you. 

                                                                              Celeste

                                                                          Viewing 5 reply threads
                                                                          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                                                          About the MRF Patient Forum

                                                                          The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                                                          The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                                                                          Popular Topics