Pooled Analysis Reinforces Long-Term Survival Benefit With Ipilimumab

Forums General Melanoma Community Pooled Analysis Reinforces Long-Term Survival Benefit With Ipilimumab

  • Post
    Rocco
    Participant

      I just happened to come across this article online this evening

      ==============================================================

      Pooled Analysis Reinforces Long-Term Survival Benefit With Ipilimumab

      Andrew J. Roth

      Published Online: Wednesday, October 2, 2013

      – See more at: http://www.onclive.com/conference-coverage/ecco-esmo-2013/Pooled-Analysis-Reinforces-Long-Term-Survival-Benefit-With-Ipilimumab#sthash.ALT7vh1t.dpuf 

      Results from a pooled analysis of data from 12 studies has demonstrated a long-term survival benefit that extends through at least 10 years for patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab (Yervoy). The results were announced by the drug’s manufacturer Bristol-Myers Squibb on September 27 and were presented at the 2013 European Cancer Congress on September 28. This study, which included 2 phase III trials, 8 phase II trials, and 2 retrospective trials, represents the largest OS analysis to date for patients with advanced or unresectable metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. The analysis also included both patients who were previously treated (n=1,257) and previously untreated (n=604).“This pooled analysis is encouraging, particularly when considering that metastatic melanoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer and historically, average survival was just six to nine months,” said F. Stephen Hodi, MD, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, in a statement. In the 1,861 patients treated with ipilimumab, median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months (95% CI: 10.7–12.1). Researchers noted a distinct plateau in OS at year 3 that extended through year 10, independent of line of therapy, ipilimumab dose, or maintenance therapy. The 3-year OS rates were 22%, in the entire study population, 26% for treatment-naïve patients, and 20% for previously treated patients. The authors of the study wrote that these OS data should be considered as a benchmark for future melanoma therapies, as they represent a large benefit in a difficult-to-treat disease.“This pooled analysis reinforces the long-term survival data seen in the individual studies and provides additional insight into the overall survival of metastatic melanoma patients treated with Yervoy,” said Brian Daniels, senior vice president, Global Development and Medical Affairs, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, in a statement. “The durability and consistency of long-term survival observed in this analysis is encouraging as we continue to advance the research and development of our immuno-oncology portfolio.”In each of the trials in the analysis, patients received ipilimumab at different doses, with the majority of patients receiving 3 mg/kg (n=965) or 10 mg/kg (n=706) every 3 or 4 weeks. Most of the studies provided the option for eligible patients to receive ipilimumab retreatment or ipilimumab maintenance therapy. Safety data were not included in the analysis. Adverse events attributed to ipilimumab, which are typically mechanism (immune)-based, were managed in individual trials with protocol-specific guidelines, including dose interruption or discontinuation and the administration of systemic corticosteroids. The FDA approved ipilimumab 3 mg/kg monotherapy in 2011 for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Ipilimumab is now approved in more than 40 countries.

      Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable melanoma. Presented at: European Cancer Congress 2013 (ECCO-ESMO-ESTRO); September 27-October 1, 2013; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Abstract 24. – See more at: http://www.onclive.com/conference-coverage/ecco-esmo-2013/Pooled-Analysis-Reinforces-Long-Term-Survival-Benefit-With-Ipilimumab#sthash.ALT7vh1t.dpuf 

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        JerryfromFauq
        Participant

          Ipi is a good step forward.  Also note who provided the data.  Suspect it understates the side effects (at least for some of the people I know!)  It also doen't mention the deaths due to side effects experienced in the trials.  Dr Weber had 3 deatgs from Ipi related side effects out of 297 cases.    When they say "{Adverse events attributed to ipilimumab, which are typically mechanism (immune)-based, were managed in individual trials with protocol-specific guidelines, including dose interruption or discontinuation and the administration of systemic corticosteroids.}"        .        Managed, but what was the outcome of the management?

            Rocco
            Participant

              Yes, experiences unfortunately vary with every type of treatment – no silver bullet for melanoma – and no easy decision on whether to go into a trial or take on an FDA approved treatment.  Hell, they are all scary aren't they?   But armed with as much info as I could gather back in 2008, I made my decision to go into an ipi trial. I look at this posting as one more piece of info people may use in their overall decision making process – ipi or no ipi. 

              I can only provide my experience – I'm an ipi responder (MDX-010 compassionate use trial back in 2008).  NED as a result of only five doses of ipi. I experienced some major side effects, was treated with high dose steroids (no picnic for sure) for a long time – but ipi still kept working.   Was it any rougher than IL-2 that I went thru – no, for me it was an easier treatment, just longer for the side effects to subside vs bouncing back after IL-2.

              Given the side effects I experienced with ipi- would I do it again?  You betcha….

              -Rocco

              Rocco
              Participant

                Yes, experiences unfortunately vary with every type of treatment – no silver bullet for melanoma – and no easy decision on whether to go into a trial or take on an FDA approved treatment.  Hell, they are all scary aren't they?   But armed with as much info as I could gather back in 2008, I made my decision to go into an ipi trial. I look at this posting as one more piece of info people may use in their overall decision making process – ipi or no ipi. 

                I can only provide my experience – I'm an ipi responder (MDX-010 compassionate use trial back in 2008).  NED as a result of only five doses of ipi. I experienced some major side effects, was treated with high dose steroids (no picnic for sure) for a long time – but ipi still kept working.   Was it any rougher than IL-2 that I went thru – no, for me it was an easier treatment, just longer for the side effects to subside vs bouncing back after IL-2.

                Given the side effects I experienced with ipi- would I do it again?  You betcha….

                -Rocco

                Rocco
                Participant

                  Yes, experiences unfortunately vary with every type of treatment – no silver bullet for melanoma – and no easy decision on whether to go into a trial or take on an FDA approved treatment.  Hell, they are all scary aren't they?   But armed with as much info as I could gather back in 2008, I made my decision to go into an ipi trial. I look at this posting as one more piece of info people may use in their overall decision making process – ipi or no ipi. 

                  I can only provide my experience – I'm an ipi responder (MDX-010 compassionate use trial back in 2008).  NED as a result of only five doses of ipi. I experienced some major side effects, was treated with high dose steroids (no picnic for sure) for a long time – but ipi still kept working.   Was it any rougher than IL-2 that I went thru – no, for me it was an easier treatment, just longer for the side effects to subside vs bouncing back after IL-2.

                  Given the side effects I experienced with ipi- would I do it again?  You betcha….

                  -Rocco

                JerryfromFauq
                Participant

                  Ipi is a good step forward.  Also note who provided the data.  Suspect it understates the side effects (at least for some of the people I know!)  It also doen't mention the deaths due to side effects experienced in the trials.  Dr Weber had 3 deatgs from Ipi related side effects out of 297 cases.    When they say "{Adverse events attributed to ipilimumab, which are typically mechanism (immune)-based, were managed in individual trials with protocol-specific guidelines, including dose interruption or discontinuation and the administration of systemic corticosteroids.}"        .        Managed, but what was the outcome of the management?

                  JerryfromFauq
                  Participant

                    Ipi is a good step forward.  Also note who provided the data.  Suspect it understates the side effects (at least for some of the people I know!)  It also doen't mention the deaths due to side effects experienced in the trials.  Dr Weber had 3 deatgs from Ipi related side effects out of 297 cases.    When they say "{Adverse events attributed to ipilimumab, which are typically mechanism (immune)-based, were managed in individual trials with protocol-specific guidelines, including dose interruption or discontinuation and the administration of systemic corticosteroids.}"        .        Managed, but what was the outcome of the management?

                Viewing 2 reply threads
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                About the MRF Patient Forum

                The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                Popular Topics