focal partial regression?

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › focal partial regression?

  • Post
    • January 3, 2013 at 11:24 am
    JC
    Participant

      Is this a bad prognostic characteristic on a path report for a melanoma less than 1mm?  Or is it only bad if it's extensive/complete regression? 

      Is this a bad prognostic characteristic on a path report for a melanoma less than 1mm?  Or is it only bad if it's extensive/complete regression? 

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        • January 8, 2013 at 3:44 pm
        JC
        Participant

          i'm not sure if the verdict is out on that, but focal partial is certainly better than extensive/complete

          • January 8, 2013 at 3:44 pm
          JC
          Participant

            i'm not sure if the verdict is out on that, but focal partial is certainly better than extensive/complete

            • January 8, 2013 at 3:44 pm
            JC
            Participant

              i'm not sure if the verdict is out on that, but focal partial is certainly better than extensive/complete

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
          About the MRF Patient Forum

          The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

          The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

          Popular Topics